Literature DB >> 6689755

Magnetic resonance and CT of the normal and diseased pancreas: a comparative study.

D D Stark, A A Moss, H I Goldberg, P L Davis, M P Federle.   

Abstract

Nineteen patients with proven pancreatic disease and 50 control subjects were examined by magnetic resonance (MR) using a variety of spin echo and inversion recovery techniques. The MR results were then compared with CT scans. The normal pancreatic head, body, and tail were identified by MR in approximately 60% of patients. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma and retroperitoneal lymphoma were detected using morphologic criteria similar to those used in CT. Differentiating bowel from pancreas was difficult on MR in patients with little retroperitoneal fat, and tissue relaxation times were usually not helpful in differentiating adenocarcinoma or lymphoma from normal pancreatic tissue. However, MR intensity, T1, and T2 were useful in differentiating pancreatic islet cell tumors from normal pancreatic tissue. MR accurately identified retroperitoneal invasion, vascular involvement, and liver metastases. In pancreatitis, tissue T1 and T2 relaxation times were prolonged and complications such as ductal dilatation, pseudocyst, phlegmon, and ascites were identified. Small pancreatic calcifications were not detected by MR. Pancreatic iron overload was seen in patients with hemochromatosis. Although respiratory motion and spatial resolution are currently limiting factors, MR is a versatile and unique modality for the evaluation of pancreatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6689755     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.150.1.6689755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  14 in total

1.  The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in pancreatic carcinoma based on a retrospective analysis of vascular involvement.

Authors:  Y Togawa; S Fujimoto; K Okui
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1989-07

2.  High-field MRI of primary gallbladder carcinoma.

Authors:  A C Wilbur; B Gyi; S A Renigers
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1988

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  J S Fache
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the kidneys.

Authors:  J H Newhouse; J A Markisz; E Kazam
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Imaging for anaesthetists: a review of the methods and anaesthetic implications of diagnostic imaging techniques.

Authors:  G Weston; L Strunin; G M Amundson
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1985-09

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging. Part II--Clinical applications.

Authors:  W R Hendee; C J Morgan
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1984-11

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas with gadolinium-DTPA.

Authors:  J L Chezmar; R C Nelson; W C Small; M E Bernardino
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

8.  Nuclear magnetic resonance of the liver, spleen, and pancreas.

Authors:  D D Stark; A A Moss; H I Goldberg
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  The relative safety of MRI contrast agent in acute necrotizing pancreatitis.

Authors:  J Werner; J Schmidt; A L Warshaw; M M Gebhard; C Herfarth; E Klar
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Gd-DTPA as an intestinal contrast agent for MR imaging of the lower abdomen: phase III clinical trial.

Authors:  L Vlahos; A Gouliamos; W Clauss; A Kalovidouris; A Athanasopoulou; A Petroulakis; A Hadjiioannou; C Papavasiliou
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1992
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.