Literature DB >> 6687818

Antinociceptive actions of morphine and buprenorphine given intrathecally in the conscious rat.

R M Bryant, J E Olley, M B Tyers.   

Abstract

1 The antinociceptive effects of morphine and buprenorphine given intrathecally and subcutaneously have been compared in the conscious rat. 2 In the paw pressure test, when given subcutaneously buprenorphine 0.001-0.1 mg/kg s.c., was approximately 100 times more potent than morphine 0.1-3 mg/kg s.c., but in the hot plate test, buprenorphine 0.03-3.0 mg/kg s.c., produced a bell-shaped dose-response curve of low maximum effect and was about equipotent with morphine 0.03-3 mg/kg s.c. 3 When given intrathecally buprenorphine 10 micrograms and morphine, 10-60 micrograms, were approximately equipotent in both paw pressure and hot plate tests. Furthermore, morphine produced these effects at 1/25th of the minimum effective parenteral dose while the dose of buprenorphine exceeded the parenteral dose. 4 It is concluded that the predominant site of the analgesic action of buprenorphine is supraspinal. The significance of these findings in relation to the role of spinal opiate receptors is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6687818      PMCID: PMC2044748          DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1983.tb09417.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pharmacol        ISSN: 0007-1188            Impact factor:   8.739


  9 in total

1.  Opiate analgesics inhibit substance P release from rat trigeminal nucleus.

Authors:  T M Jessell; L L Iversen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-08-11       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  A classification of opiate receptors that mediate antinociception in animals.

Authors:  M B Tyers
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  The effects of morphine- and nalorphine- like drugs in the nondependent and morphine-dependent chronic spinal dog.

Authors:  W R Martin; C G Eades; J A Thompson; R E Huppler; P E Gilbert
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Opiate receptor binding in primate spinal cord: distribution and changes after dorsal root section.

Authors:  C Lamotte; C B Pert; S H Snyder
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-13       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Selective epidural analgesia.

Authors:  M J Wolfe; A D Nicholas
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-07-21       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Epidural morphine in treatment of pain.

Authors:  M Behar; F Magora; D Olshwang; J T Davidson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-03-10       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Further studies on opiate receptors that mediate antinoception: tooth pulp stimulation in the dog.

Authors:  M Skingle; M B Tyers
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  Involvement of the median raphe nucleus in antinociception induced by morphine, buprenorphine and tilidine in the rat.

Authors:  R M Bryant; J E Olley; M B Tyers
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Analgesia mediated by a direct spinal action of narcotics.

Authors:  T L Yaksh; T A Rudy
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-06-25       Impact factor: 47.728

  9 in total
  8 in total

1.  [Not Available].

Authors:  I Jurna
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.107

2.  Spinal antinociceptive actions and naloxone reversibility of intravenous mu- and kappa-opioids in spinalized rats: potency mismatch with values reported for spinal administration.

Authors:  C G Parsons; D C West; P M Headley
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Spinal opioid analgesia. A critical update.

Authors:  L L Gustafsson; Z Wiesenfeld-Hallin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Pronociceptive and Antinociceptive Effects of Buprenorphine in the Spinal Cord Dorsal Horn Cover a Dose Range of Four Orders of Magnitude.

Authors:  Katharina J Gerhold; Ruth Drdla-Schutting; Silke D Honsek; Liesbeth Forsthuber; Jürgen Sandkühler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Spinal antinociceptive actions of mu- and kappa-opioids: the importance of stimulus intensity in determining 'selectivity' between reflexes to different modalities of noxious stimulus.

Authors:  C G Parsons; P M Headley
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Interactions between mu and kappa opioid agonists in the rat drug discrimination procedure.

Authors:  S S Negus; M J Picker; L A Dykstra
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Modeling nociception in zebrafish: a way forward for unbiased analgesic discovery.

Authors:  Andrew Curtright; Micaela Rosser; Shamii Goh; Bailey Keown; Erinn Wagner; Jasmine Sharifi; David W Raible; Ajay Dhaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Identification of a novel spinal nociceptive-motor gate control for Aδ pain stimuli in rats.

Authors:  Dvir Blivis; Gal Haspel; Philip Z Mannes; Michael J O'Donovan; Michael J Iadarola
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.