Literature DB >> 668779

The placebo dilemma.

L Schindel.   

Abstract

Placebos have been used since about 1950 in evaluation and interpretation of drug efficacy, especially of new drugs, and in comparison with existing compounds to establish their clinical therapeutic value. There are a number of problems connected with use of an "inert nothing" the informed consent, which is required in a human experiment, the doctor's consciousness of deceitful behaviour, the potential risk for the patient and the doctor, the high effect rate of placebos (+/- 35%), unexpected side-effects, dependency of patients on placebos, discovery by the patient of the placebo treatment, factors independent of the medication, such as the doctor's bias, the nurses influence, the significance of colour, the inconsistency of placebo-reactor or non-reactor types and the genetic state of the patient, as well as the problems associated with a double blind test, which can hardly be used when a patient has previously received a medicine, such as morphine, with its euphoric effect, and the colour change produced in urine by drugs like rifampicin or riboflavin. Only a well-trained and experienced clinical observer should employ a placebo in establishing the therapeutic value of drugs whilst avoiding undesirable pitfalls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 668779     DOI: 10.1007/BF00609988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  10 in total

1.  The powerful placebo.

Authors:  H K BEECHER
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1955-12-24

2.  Do placebos alter sleep?

Authors:  K Adam; L Adamson; V Brezinová; I Oswald
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-01-24

3.  The validity of "identical matching placebos".

Authors:  D S Blumenthal; R Burke; A K Shapiro
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1974-08

4.  The double-blind dilemma.

Authors:  A Kligman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1973-09-24       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Simple analgesics for arthritis.

Authors:  E C Huskisson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1974-10-26

6.  The ethics of giving placebos.

Authors:  S Bok
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.142

7.  Acetylator status and response to phenelzine in depressed patients.

Authors:  E C Johnstone; W Marsh
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1973-03-17       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  [Placebo and placebo-effects in the clinic and research].

Authors:  L Schindel
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1967-07

9.  Matching quality of agents employed in "double-blind" controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  L E Hill; A J Nunn; W Fox
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Study on the effects of tablet colour in the treatment of anxiety states.

Authors:  K Schapira; H A McClelland; N R Griffiths; D J Newell
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1970-05-23
  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Development of new drugs in man: a review.

Authors:  I B Davies; I M Grind; A Pottage; P Turner
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Determining the reporting quality of RCTs in clinical pharmacology.

Authors:  Edward Mills; Yoon K Loke; Ping Wu; Victor M Montori; Daniel Perri; David Moher; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Meptazinol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  B Holmes; A Ward
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 9.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.