Literature DB >> 668524

[Propafenon and lidoflazine in chronic atrial fibrillation and flutter (author's transl)].

O A Beck, H U Lehmann, H Hochrein.   

Abstract

60 patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and flutter were randomly allotted to two groups and treated alternately with two different therapy regimes. 30 patients (group I) received lidoflazine in increasing dosage up to 480 mg/24 h and in cases where there was no conversion to sinus rhythm propafenon in a maximal daily dosage of 1800 mg orally. The duration of treatment was limited to 4 days for each substance. 30 patients (group II) were treated in the reverse order, i.e. propafenon and in cases of ineffectiveness with lidoflazine. Atrial fibrillation could be overcome in 21 patients in group I and in 23 patients in group II. The combined success rate in both groups was 73%. The conversion rates for the individual substances were 41% for propafenon (17 out of 41 patients) and 59% for lidoflazine (27 out of 46 patients). The difference was not statistically significant. Successive use of both substances leads to an increased conversion rate. Dangers arising from therapy are a conduction inhibitory action and depression of sinus node function as far as propafenol is concerned and the risk of ventricular ectopy and tachyarrhythmia in lidoflazine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 668524     DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1104816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0012-0472            Impact factor:   0.628


  3 in total

Review 1.  Propafenone. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in the treatment of arrhythmias.

Authors:  D W Harron; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Lucie Valembois; Etienne Audureau; Andrea Takeda; Witold Jarzebowski; Joël Belmin; Carmelo Lafuente-Lafuente
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-09-04

Review 3.  Why translation from basic discoveries to clinical applications is so difficult for atrial fibrillation and possible approaches to improving it.

Authors:  Stanley Nattel; Philip T Sager; Jörg Hüser; Jordi Heijman; Dobromir Dobrev
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 10.787

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.