The corticocuneate pathway in the cat: relations among terminal distribution patterns, cytoarchitecture, and single neuron functional properties.

A combined anatomical and physiological strategy was used to investigate the organization of the corticocuneate pathway in the cat. The distribution of the corticocuneate projection was mapped by means of the anterograde horseradish peroxidase (HRP) labeling technique and correlated with the nuclear cytoarchitecture in Nissl and Golgi material, the distribution of retrogradely labeled relay cells after HRP injections in the ventrobasal complex of the thalamus, and the topographic organization derived from single- and multiunit recordings in the decerebrate, unanesthetized cat. This approach provided details about the arrangement of the corticocuneate pathway that were not available from previous studies with anterograde degeneration methods. On the basis of cytoarchitectonic and connectional features, a number of subdivisions are identified in the cuneate nucleus, each of which is associated with characteristic functional properties. In agreement with previous studies, it is found that a large portion of the cuneate nucleus, the middle dorsal part (MCd), is exclusively devoted to the representation of cutaneous receptive fields on the digits. This "core" region contains more thalamic projecting neurons than any other subdivision of the cuneate nucleus. A topographic arrangement also exists in the subdivisions of the rostral cuneate and of the nuclear region ventral to MCd, although in these, receptive fields are larger and predominantly, but not exclusively, related to deep receptors and involve the arm, shoulder, and trunk. Observations on corticocuneate projections were based on injections, mainly focused on functional subdivisions of the primary somatosensory cortex (SI) as described by McKenna et al. (1981). Although cortical projections are mainly to cuneate regions other than its core, a significant proportion of fibers from the region of SI where the digits are represented (particularly area 3b) do project to the MCd region of the cuneate nucleus. Similarly, nuclear areas associated with receptive fields on the arm and trunk are labeled after injection in SI arm and trunk regions, respectively. Thus, a close topographic relationship appears to exist between the somatosensory cortex and cuneate regions related to the same body representation, although nuclear regions in which receptive fields on the neck area are represented receive very sparse or no detectable cortical projections even when the injection of the tracer involves the entire sensorimotor cortex.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)