Literature DB >> 6678822

A comparative study of centbucridine and lidocaine in dental extraction.

G N Vacharajani, N Parikh, T Paul, R S Satoskar.   

Abstract

A randomized double-blind study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of centbucridine (0.5%) with those of lidocaine (2%) as an anaesthetic agent was conducted in the dental outpatient department on patients attending for dental extraction. One hundred and twenty patients were studied. The degree of analgesia attained with centbucridine compared well with that obtained with lidocaine. The compound was well tolerated with no significant changes in the cardiovascular parameters and no serious side-effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6678822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Res        ISSN: 0251-1649


  4 in total

Review 1.  What's new in local anesthesia?

Authors:  S F Malamed
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1992

2.  Comparison of 0.5% Centbucridine and 2% Lignocaine as Local Anesthetic Agents for Dental Procedures in Children: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Nikhita Satish Gune; Amar Narayan Katre
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  A comparative study between 0.5% centbucridine HCl and 2% lignocaine HCl with adrenaline (1:2,00,000).

Authors:  Arun Dugal; Ritika Khanna; Amod Patankar
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2009-11-21

4.  A randomized controlled trail comparing the efficacy of 0.5% centbucridine to 2% lignocaine as local anesthetics in dental extractions.

Authors:  Samir Mansuri; Ahmed Bhayat; Esam Omar; Fadi Jarab; Mohammad Sami Ahmed
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2011-11-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.