Literature DB >> 6675380

In vitro fertilization and microsurgery.

B Hedon, R Dejean, J P Daure, P Mares, B Valentin, J L Viala, G Durand.   

Abstract

The places microsurgery and in vitro fertilization (IVF) hold, respectively, in the treatment of tubal infertility are evaluated. "Optimal" and "acceptable" results of the two techniques are compared, and future results are talked about. Most of the indications for microsurgery are still valid, some are debatable (salpingostomies with bad prognosis, repeated surgery, tubal transplant, etc.), and some new ones emerge. Technically speaking, IVF introduces some changes in surgery of the ovary and surrounding tissues and gives rise to new techniques. Diagnostic and therapeutic management is changed insofar as initial assessment, preoperative coelioscopy and, above all, postoperative monitoring are concerned. The microsurgeon, who is to remain a reproduction specialist, undergoes few personal changes, but his team must be organized on a multi-field basis in order to cope with the new techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6675380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Eur Fertil        ISSN: 0587-2421


  1 in total

1.  What proportion of couples undergoing unrestricted in vitro fertilization treatments can expect to bear a child?

Authors:  P Paterson; C Chan
Journal:  J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf       Date:  1987-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.