Literature DB >> 6662947

Nine standardized scales for evaluating treatment outcome in a mental health clinic.

A Clark, M J Friedman.   

Abstract

Analyzed psychometrics of a package of standardized scales used to assess mental health treatment outcomes in a VA cost-effectiveness study (N = 451). Nine scales were derived: Family involvement, involvement with friends, labor market participation, symptomatology (both self-reported and therapist rated), substance abuse (alcohol and drugs), client satisfaction, and client goal attainment. Scales were drawn from several existing instruments, including the Denver Community Mental Health Questionnaire (CMHQ), the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90), the Global Assessment scale, and others. Item-item and item-total correlations showed each scale to have high internal consistency. Principal components analysis demonstrated distinct factors for each scale and good clustering of items within scales. All scale items are discrete choice and have excellent interrater reliability. Validity was corroborated by multiple regression, which showed different scales to be sensitive to different predictors of follow-up status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6662947     DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(198311)39:6<939::aid-jclp2270390620>3.0.co;2-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9762


  3 in total

1.  Measuring treatment outcomes and client satisfaction in a partial hospitalization program.

Authors:  D H Granello; P F Granello; F Lee
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.505

Review 2.  Global function scales.

Authors:  M Phelan; T Wykes; H Goldman
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  The longitudinal use of the Global Assessment Scale in multiple-rater situations.

Authors:  R J Dworkin; L C Friedman; R L Telschow; K D Grant; H S Moffic; V J Sloan
Journal:  Community Ment Health J       Date:  1990-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.