Literature DB >> 6661284

Retention of conditioned inhibition of the nictitating membrane response in decorticate rabbits.

C H Yeo, M J Hardiman, J W Moore, I S Russell.   

Abstract

Rabbits were trained on a Pavlovian conditioned inhibition (CI) task using light as the reinforced conditional stimulus (CS) and the same light compounded with a tone as the non-reinforced CS. The conditional response was the nictitating membrane response (NMR). The subjects then received an extensive neocortical lesion or a sham operation. After 9 weeks postoperative recovery, the animals were retrained on the CI task. Sham operated control animals showed immediate and high levels of CI retention but the decorticates showed a profound initial loss, showing that there is a cortical influence in CI. Reacquisition of CI by the decorticates was rapid and showed considerable savings over de novo acquisition. This supports our earlier finding that the neocortex is not essential for the acquisition of CI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6661284     DOI: 10.1016/0166-4328(83)90042-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

1.  Conditioned inhibition in a rodent model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  John T Green; Amy C Chess; Cynthia J Conquest; Brittney A Yegla
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Perirhinal cortex lesions impair feature-negative discrimination.

Authors:  Matthew M Campolattaro; John H Freeman
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2006-04-17       Impact factor: 2.877

3.  Selective attention and Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Ian Steele-Russell; M I Russell; J A Castiglioni; J A Reuter; M W van Hof
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Purkinje cell loss by OX7-saporin impairs excitatory and inhibitory eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Brian C Nolan; John H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Differential effects of cerebellar inactivation on eyeblink conditioned excitation and inhibition.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Hunter E Halverson; Amy Poremba
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-01-26       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Blockade of GABAA receptors in the interpositus nucleus modulates expression of conditioned excitation but not conditioned inhibition of the eyeblink response.

Authors:  Brian C Nolan; Daniel A Nicholson; John H Freeman
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  2002 Oct-Dec
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.