Literature DB >> 6658991

Observer variability in evaluating extracranial carotid artery stenosis.

P M Chikos, L D Fisher, J H Hirsch, J D Harley, B L Thiele, D E Strandness.   

Abstract

One hundred twenty eight cervical carotid arteriograms were twice viewed by three readers for the evaluation of atherosclerotic disease at the carotid bifurcation. Stenoses were estimated using calipers to the nearest 5% and lesions were qualitatively characterized as smooth, irregular, or ulcerated. The intraobserver correlation coefficient between estimates of percent stenosis was .94 overall and .98 for the internal carotid artery. The average intraobserver variability in estimating percent stenosis was 5.23% for all vessels and 6.04% with a standard deviation of 8.09% for the internal carotid artery. The intraobserver percent agreement at a fixed stenosis is defined as the percent of the time one reader on two readings would read at least the fixed percent stenosis among cases that might be read as having the fixed percent stenosis. The intraobserver percent agreement rate for the internal carotid artery was 95.9% at greater than 0% stenosis, 90.4% for 50% or greater stenosis, and 96.8% for 100% stenosis (total occlusion). The interobserver correlation coefficient between readers was .92 overall and .97 for the internal carotid artery. The absolute difference in percent stenosis between readers was 7.21% for all vessels and 8.64% for the internal carotid artery with a standard deviation of 9.5%. The interobserver agreement rate for the internal carotid artery at greater than 0% stenosis was 93.0%, 85.4% for 50% or greater stenosis and 96.8% at 100% stenosis. The addition of oblique views had no statistical effect on estimates of percent stenosis but increased the frequency with which irregularity and ulceration were diagnosed in the internal carotid artery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6658991     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.14.6.885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  7 in total

1.  Measurement error of percent diameter carotid stenosis determined by conventional angiography: implications for noninvasive evaluation.

Authors:  Joseph E Heiserman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasound, and digital subtraction angiography in assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  G R Young; P R Humphrey; M D Shaw; T E Nixon; E T Smith
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Observer variation in the interpretation of intra-arterial angiograms and the risk of inappropriate decisions about carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  G R Young; P A Sandercock; J Slattery; P R Humphrey; E T Smith; L Brock
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Striatocapsular infarction: MRI and MR angiography.

Authors:  P Croisille; F Turjman; B Croisile; P Tournut; J C Laharotte; G Aimard; M Trillet; J Duquesnel; J C Froment
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Transient cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  M D Cusimano; F M Ameli
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-01-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Imaging blood vessels of the head and neck.

Authors:  R J Sellar
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Optimization of duplex velocity criteria for diagnosis of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis: A report of the Intersocietal Accreditation Commission (IAC) Vascular Testing Division Carotid Diagnostic Criteria Committee.

Authors:  Heather L Gornik; Tatjana Rundek; Hannah Gardener; James F Benenati; Nirvikar Dahiya; Naomi M Hamburg; Ann Marie Kupinski; Steven A Leers; Michael P Lilly; Joann M Lohr; John S Pellerito; Kenneth S Rholl; Melissa A Vickery; Marge S Hutchisson; Laurence Needleman
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.239

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.