Literature DB >> 6655388

Proxy consent and counterfactual wishes.

E Wierenga.   

Abstract

I discuss conditions for the validity of proxy consent to treatment on behalf of an incompetent person. I distinguish those incompetents who, when previously competent, expressed an opinion on the treatment in question from those who were never competent or who, though previously competent, never expressed an opinion on the proposed treatment. In the former case valid proxy consent usually requires respecting the stated wishes of the patient. The latter case is more difficult. I consider a widely-held principle which appeals to the counterfactual wishes of the incompetent person. I argue that it is unacceptable and propose in its place a principle having to do with the best interests of the patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Philosophical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6655388     DOI: 10.1093/jmp/8.4.405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  1 in total

1.  "What the patient would have decided": a fundamental problem with the substituted judgment standard.

Authors:  Linus Broström; Mats Johansson; Morten Klemme Nielsen
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2006-11-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.