Literature DB >> 6653536

Environmental standards for ionizing radiation: theoretical basis for dose-response curves.

A C Upton.   

Abstract

The types of injury attributable to ionizing radiation are subdivided, for purposes of risk assessment and radiological protection, into two broad categories: stochastic effects and nonstochastic effects. Stochastic effects are viewed as probablistic phenomena, varying in frequency but not severity as a function of the dose, without any threshold; nonstochastic effects are viewed as deterministic phenomena, varying in both frequency and severity as a function of the dose, with clinical thresholds. Included among stochastic effects are heritable effects (mutations and chromosome aberrations) and carcinogenic effects. Both types of effects are envisioned as unicellular phenomena which can result from nonlethal injury of individual cells, without the necessity of damage to other cells. For the induction of mutations and chromosome aberrations in the low-to-intermediate dose range, the dose-response curve with high-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation generally conforms to a linear nonthreshold relationship and varies relatively little with the dose rate. In contrast, the curve with low-LET radiation generally conforms to a linear-quadratic relationship, rising less steeply than the curve with high-LET radiation and increasing in slope with increasing dose and dose rate. The dose-response curve for carcinogenic effects varies widely from one type of neoplasm to another in the intermediate-to-high dose range, in part because of differences in the way large doses of radiation can affect the promotion and progression of different neoplasms. Information about dose-response relations for low-level irradiation is fragmentary but consistent, in general, with the hypothesis that the neoplastic transformation may result from mutation, chromosome aberration or genetic recombination in a single susceptible cell.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6653536      PMCID: PMC1569362          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.835231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  14 in total

1.  The influence of dose and dose rate on the incidence of neoplastic disease in RFM mice after neutron irradiation.

Authors:  R L Ullrich; M C Jernigan; G E Cosgrove; L C Satterfield; N D Bowles; J B Storer
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 2.  Malignant transformation in vitro: criteria, biological markers, and application in environmental screening of carcinogens.

Authors:  C Borek
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 3.  Quantitative theories of oncogenesis.

Authors:  A S Whittemore
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 6.242

4.  Neutron carcinogenesis. Dose and dose-rate effects in BALB/c mice.

Authors:  R L Ullrich; M C Jernigan; J B Storer
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 5.  Radiobiological effects of low doses. Implications for radiological protection.

Authors:  A C Upton
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Preferential radiosensitization of mouse sarcoma relative to normal skin by chronic intra-arterial infusion of halogenated pyrimidine analogs.

Authors:  J M Brown; D R Goffinet; J E Cleaver; R F Kallman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  The shape of the dose-response curve for radiation carcinogenesis. Extrapolation to low doses.

Authors:  J M Brown
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  Malignant transformation in cultured hamster embryo cells produced by X-rays, 460-keV monoenergetic neutrons, and heavy ions.

Authors:  C Borek; E J Hall; H H Rossi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  DNA repair and malignant transformation: effect of X irradiation, 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate, and protease inhibitors on transformation and sister-chromatid exchanges in mouse 10T 1/2 cells.

Authors:  J B Little; H Nagasawa; A R Kennedy
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 2.841

10.  Carcinogenesis and radiation risk: a biomathematical reconnaissance.

Authors:  W V Mayneord; R H Clarke
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1975       Impact factor: 3.039

View more
  3 in total

1.  GDF-15 gene expression alterations in human lymphoblastoid cells and peripheral blood lymphocytes following exposure to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Shuang Li; Qing-Zhao Zhang; De-Qin Zhang; Jiang-Bin Feng; Qun Luo; Xue Lu; Xin-Ru Wang; Kun-Peng Li; De-Qing Chen; Xiao-Feng Mu; Ling Gao; Qing-Jie Liu
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.952

Review 2.  Chemical carcinogens: a review of the science and its associated principles. U.S. Interagency Staff Group on Carcinogens.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 9.031

3.  Epidemiology of radiation-induced cancer.

Authors:  E P Radford
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.