Literature DB >> 6652429

The colonic conduit: a better method of urinary diversion?

J T Hill, P G Ransley.   

Abstract

The colonic conduit urinary diversion has been assessed in a retrospective study of 47 children in order to compare the results of this operation with that of other forms of urinary diversion. The overall complication rate was 81%. The rate of stomal stenosis was 34% and that of upper tract dilatation was 36%. These results are very similar to the complication rate for the ileal conduit, which is now the most popular form of urinary diversion. It is suggested that all forms of urinary diversion have a high long-term complication rate and that other means of management should be considered more seriously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6652429     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1983.tb03391.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  3 in total

1.  Does reflux in orthotopic diversion matter? A randomized prospective comparison of the Studer and T-pouch ileal neobladders.

Authors:  Eila C Skinner; Donald G Skinner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Continence in patients with spina bifida: long term results.

Authors:  P S Malone; R A Wheeler; J E Williams
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Bladder, bowel and bugs--bacteriuria in patients with intestinal urinary diversion.

Authors:  Björn Wullt; William Agace; Wiking Mansson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 4.226

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.