Literature DB >> 6651168

Objective assessment of standard nostril types--a morphometric study.

L G Farkas, T A Hreczko, C K Deutsch.   

Abstract

Nostril type was assigned according to the inclination of the medial longitudinal axis of the nostrils, generally following the Topinard system in a group of randomly selected, healthy young North Americans. The group was composed of 156 Caucasians, 55 Asians, and 32 blacks. The 33 noses with asymmetrical nares were excluded from the remainder of the study. Five other measurements of the soft nose were taken (protrusion of the nasal tip, width of the nose, width of the columella, and length of the right and left columellar rims). Three indices showing the relationships of these measurements were also calculated. The most common nares were Type II in Caucasians (52.8%), Type III in Asians (52.8%), and Type VI in blacks (50.0%). Specific columellar and alar base configurations were associated with many nostril types. These data about nostril types and the soft nose provide important guidelines for reconstructive and cosmetic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6651168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  10 in total

1.  Nasal Analysis and Anatomy: Anthropometric Proportional Assessment in Asians-Aesthetic Balance from Forehead to Chin, Part I.

Authors:  JeongHoon Suhk; JinSoo Park; Anh H Nguyen
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Rhinoplasty: the african american patient.

Authors:  Adeyiza O Momoh; Daniel A Hatef; Anthony Griffin; Anthony E Brissett
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  Long-Term Effect of Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis (DO) on Nasal Index in Adult Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate Deformities.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar Jena; Vidya Rattan; Satinder Pal Singh; Ashok Kumar Utreja; Singh Sombir
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-04-28

4.  Geography of the nose: a morphometric study.

Authors:  L G Farkas; J C Kolar; I R Munro
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Quantitative assessment of craniofacial morphology in Johanson-Blizzard syndrome.

Authors:  Curtis K Deutsch; Tania Hreczko; Lewis B Holmes
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2013-03-06

6.  Categorization and Analysis of Nasal Base Shapes Using a Parametric Model.

Authors:  Alisa Zhukhovitskaya; Dalan Cragun; Erica Su; Christian H Barnes; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.611

7.  Quantitative Analysis and Classification of the Nasal Base Using a Parametric Model.

Authors:  Christian H Barnes; Heidi Chen; Jason J Chen; Erica Su; Wesley J Moy; Brian J F Wong
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.611

8.  Nasal sill augmentation: an overlooked concept in rhinoplasty-a technical note and review of the literatures.

Authors:  Gholamhossein Adham; Seied Omid Keyhan; Hamid Reza Fallahi; Heliya Ziaei; Mohan Thomas
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2021-05-18

9.  Philtral columns and nostril shapes in nigerian children: a morphometric and aesthetic analysis.

Authors:  Ibrahim Abdulrasheed; Asuku Malachy Eneye
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2013-06-11

10.  Sublabial Autologous Ear Cartilage Grafting for Increasing the Nasolabial Angle.

Authors:  Rajko Toncic; Dinko Toncic
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2016-01-15
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.