Literature DB >> 6649443

Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity and visual field locus.

M J Wright, A Johnston.   

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity, measured as a function of retinal eccentricity for stimuli differing in temporal and spatial frequency (0.25-9 c/deg; 0-16 Hz, 0-12 degrees eccentricity), was maximum at the fovea and declined linearly with eccentricity. The slope of the decrease depended upon spatial but not temporal frequency. Contrast sensitivity for drifting gratings was approximately twice that for sinusoidal counterphase gratings at all eccentricities. For central viewing log contrast sensitivity increased with grating length. The shape of this function was systematically related to spatial frequency but independent of temporal frequency, indicating that the visual field is homogeneous in sensitivity for change in contrast over time. The implications of these findings for mechanisms of threshold vision in fovea and periphery are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6649443     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90008-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  14 in total

1.  Local motion processing limits fine direction discrimination in the periphery.

Authors:  Isabelle Mareschal; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  How Attention Affects Spatial Resolution.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Antoine Barbot
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2015-05-06

3.  Masking by light and the sustained-transient dichotomy.

Authors:  M Green
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-06

4.  Facial emotion processing in patients with social anxiety disorder and Williams-Beuren syndrome: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Cynthia Binelli; Armando Muñiz; Susana Subira; Ricard Navines; Laura Blanco-Hinojo; Debora Perez-Garcia; Jose Crippa; Magi Farré; Luis Pérez-Jurado; Jesus Pujol; Rocio Martin-Santos
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.186

5.  Spatial frequency bandwidth of surround suppression tuning curves.

Authors:  Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza; John P Grady; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Attentional enhancement of spatial resolution: linking behavioural and neurophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Binocular contrast summation and inhibition depends on spatial frequency, eccentricity and binocular disparity.

Authors:  Concetta F Alberti; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Illusory Motion Perception Is Associated with Contrast Discrimination but Not Motion Sensitivity, Self-Reported Visual Discomfort, or Migraine Status.

Authors:  Chongyue He; Bao Ngoc Nguyen; Yu Man Chan; Allison Maree McKendrick
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Presaccadic attention improves or impairs performance by enhancing sensitivity to higher spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; Jasmine Pan; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Speed discrimination in the far monocular periphery: A relative advantage for interocular comparisons consistent with self-motion.

Authors:  Devon A Greer; Kathryn Bonnen; Alexander C Huk; Lawrence K Cormack
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.