Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 The Aarhus County vagotomy trial. II. An interim report on reduction in acid secretion and ulcer recurrence rate following parietal cell vagotomy and selective gastric vagotomy.

× No keyword cloud information.

4 in total

1. A study of the failures after gastrectomy.

Authors: A H VISICK
Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 1948-11 Impact factor: 1.891

2. The Aarhus County vagotomy trial. I. An interim report on primary results and incidence of sequelae following parietal cell vagotomy and selective gastric vagotomy in 748 patients.

Authors: E Amdrup; D Andersen; H Høstrup
Journal: World J Surg Date: 1978-01 Impact factor: 3.352

3. Late results of bilateral selective vagotomy and pyloroplasty for duodenal ulcer: 5-9-year follow-up.

Authors: J De Miguel
Journal: Br J Surg Date: 1974-04 Impact factor: 6.939

4. One hundred patients five years after selective gastric vagotomy and drainage for duodenal ulcer.

Authors: E Amdrup; H E Jensen
Journal: Surgery Date: 1973-09 Impact factor: 3.982

4 in total

24 in total

1. Recurrent peptic ulcers.

Authors: D Johnston; R L Blackett
Journal: World J Surg Date: 1987-06 Impact factor: 3.352

2. Proximal gastric vagotomy and pyloroplasty for duodenal ulcer with pyloric stenosis: a thirteen-year experience.

Authors: O C Lunde; I Liavåg; M Roland
Journal: World J Surg Date: 1985-02 Impact factor: 3.352

3. Comparison of different strategies for treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Authors: A Sonnenberg
Journal: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) Date: 1985-04-20

4. Relationship between gastric acid secretion and the rate of recurrent ulcer after parietal cell vagotomy.

Authors: F Cohen; P Valleur; J Serra; D Brisset; L Chiche; P Hautefeuille
Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1993-03 Impact factor: 12.969

5. How do clinical results after proximal gastric vagotomy compare with the Visick grade pattern of healthy controls?

Authors: C Muller; B Engelke; L Fiedler; A Marrie; E Mühe; W Schmitz-Harbauer; V Zumtobel
Journal: World J Surg Date: 1983-09 Impact factor: 3.352

6. Should it be parietal cell vagotomy or selective vagotomy-antrectomy for treatment of duodenal ulcer? A progress report.

Authors: P H Jordan; J Thornby
Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1987-05 Impact factor: 12.969

7. Recurrences 1 to 10 years after highly selective vagotomy in prepyloric and duodenal ulcer disease. Frequency, pattern, and predictors.

Authors: H O Adami; L K Enander; L Enskog; C Ingvar; B Rydberg
Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1984-04 Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8. Evaluation and management of patients with recurrent peptic ulcer disease after acid-reducing operations: a systematic review.

Authors: Richard H Turnage; George Sarosi; Byron Cryer; Stuart Spechler; Walter Peterson; Mark Feldman
Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.452

9. An interim report on parietal cell vagotomy versus selective vagotomy and antrectomy for treatment of duodenal ulcer.

Authors: P H Jordan
Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1979-05 Impact factor: 12.969

10. Short-term treatment of prepyloric ulcer. Comparison of sucralfate and cimetidine.

Authors: L E Svedberg; L Carling; H Glise; B Hallerbäck; I Kagevi; J H Solhaug; L Wählby
Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 1987-03 Impact factor: 3.199