Literature DB >> 6646048

Comparison of four different methods for detection of rubella IgM antibodies.

T Mertens, C Zippel, R Seuffer, H J Eggers.   

Abstract

Four different tests for detection of rubella-specific IgM antibodies were compared: two Ig separation methods (centrifugation and chromatography) with subsequent haemagglutination inhibition test and two commercially available ELISA tests. The 114 sera tested had been sent to the diagnostic laboratory, mostly with insufficient clinical histories. Agreement between the centrifugation method and one of the ELISA tests was good (2 divergent results with 107 sera tested), while the other ELISA test yielded more positive (partly perhaps non-specific) results. The chromatographic method did not separate the Ig classes as reliably as the centrifugation method, but because of its simplicity it may be useful, if adequate test controls are performed. The divergent results are discussed. It is postulated that in cases with pending induced abortion, two independent tests should be performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6646048     DOI: 10.1007/BF02123804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol        ISSN: 0300-8584            Impact factor:   3.402


  9 in total

1.  [Studies on optimising rubella virus haemagglutination-inhibitor tests].

Authors:  J Leidel; T Mertens; G Fischer; G Hermann; H J Eggers
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1976-09-17       Impact factor: 0.628

2.  Method for rapid separation of immunoglobulin M from immunoglobulin G antibodies by using reorienting gardients in vertical rotors.

Authors:  H J Wolf; G G Frösner; F Deinhardt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Rubella: a method for rapid diagnosis of a recent infection by demonstration of the IgM antibodies.

Authors:  T Vesikari; A Vaheri
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1968-01-27

4.  [Appearance and persistence of rubella-specific IgM antibodies (author's transl)].

Authors:  J Leidel; T Mertens; H J Eggers
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  1977-10-07       Impact factor: 0.628

5.  Evaluation of a simplified sucrose gradient method for the detection of rubella-specific IgM in routine diagnostic practice.

Authors:  E O Caul; S J Hobbs; P C Roberts; S K Clarke
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.327

6.  Demonstration of rubella-specific IgM by serum ultracentrifugation on sucrose gradients: comparison of a vertical and a swinging bucket rotor.

Authors:  W Schürmann; C Zippel; T Mertens; H J Eggers
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Antigen requirements, sensitivity, and specificity of enzyme immunoassays for measles and rubella viral antibodies.

Authors:  B Forghani; N J Schmidt
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Hemagglutination inhibition, single radial hemolysis, and ELISA tests for the detection of IgG and IgM to rubella virus.

Authors:  H Champsaur; E Dussaix; P Tournier
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.327

9.  Comparison of different methods for the detection of rubella-specific IgM antibodies.

Authors:  R Braun; H W Doerr; H P Geisen; C Hornig; U Huschka; K Munk
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.327

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of five different methods of rubella IgM antibody testing.

Authors:  H Cubie; E Edmond
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.411

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.