Literature DB >> 6643161

Temperature distributions from interstitial rf electrode hyperthermia systems: theoretical predictions.

J W Strohbehn.   

Abstract

In recent years, there has been increased interest in the use of hyperthermia as an adjuvant modality to radiation and chemotherapy in the treatment of cancer. One of the more promising techniques is the application of an rf voltage to an array of electrodes inserted directly into the tumor. The electrodes are usually small, hollow stainless steel needles that are inserted as the first step in a brachytherapy procedure. By applying a voltage between the needles, an rf current is induced in the tissue, resulting in joule heating. In this paper, we calculate numerically the temperature distributions for an array of such needles. In our model we assume a two-dimensional problem, i.e. infinitely long needles, and a homogeneous medium. Blood flow effects are included in the calculation. The results show that for low blood perfusion rates, e.g., on the order of 3 ml/100 gm X min, very smooth temperature distributions result, and the electrodes can be spaced fairly far apart. However, for blood flow rates on the order of 20 ml/100 gm X min the temperature distributions are not smooth, and there are hot spots around the electrodes and cool regions between them. However, if the electrodes are spaced about 1 cm apart and the voltages are adjusted to optimize the temperature distribution then reasonably good results should be achievable. The equation is solved using a finite difference technique. By applying the superpostion principle, we are able to introduce a procedure which substantially reduces the amount of core storage required and results in reasonably efficient run times on a moderate size mini-computer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6643161     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(83)90419-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

1.  The use of radiofrequency catheter ablation to extract a chronic permanent pacemaker lead after failed laser extraction.

Authors:  Deepak Roshan Talreja; Samuel Asirvatham; David L Hayes
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Technology for minimal access surgery. Interview by Judy Jones.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-13

3.  Comparison of unipolar versus bipolar ablation and single electrode control versus simultaneous multielectrode temperature control.

Authors:  Pramesh Kovoor; Michael Daly; Jim Pouliopoulos; Vicki Eipper; Barbara Dewsnap; David L Ross
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Radiofrequency ablation of porcine liver in vivo: effects of blood flow and treatment time on lesion size.

Authors:  E J Patterson; C H Scudamore; D A Owen; A G Nagy; A K Buczkowski
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Intermittent hepatic vein balloon occlusion during radiofrequency ablation in the liver.

Authors:  Deepak Sudheendra; Ziv Neeman; Anthony Kam; Julia Locklin; Steven K Libutti; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 6.  Review of temperature dependence of thermal properties, dielectric properties, and perfusion of biological tissues at hyperthermic and ablation temperatures.

Authors:  Christian Rossmanna; Dieter Haemmerich
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2014

7.  Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for lumbar facet joint pain from a multispecialty, international working group.

Authors:  Steven P Cohen; Arun Bhaskar; Anuj Bhatia; Asokumar Buvanendran; Tim Deer; Shuchita Garg; W Michael Hooten; Robert W Hurley; David J Kennedy; Brian C McLean; Jee Youn Moon; Samer Narouze; Sanjog Pangarkar; David Anthony Provenzano; Richard Rauck; B Todd Sitzman; Matthew Smuck; Jan van Zundert; Kevin Vorenkamp; Mark S Wallace; Zirong Zhao
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 6.288

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.