Literature DB >> 6641850

Automatic postural responses in the cat: responses to headward and tailward translation.

D S Rushmer, C J Russell, J macpherson, J O Phillips, D C Dunbar.   

Abstract

EMG responses, vertical and A-P shear forces and kinematics of "automatic postural responses" to unexpected translational perturbations in the headward and tailward directions were studied in cats. Muscles acting on the major joints of the forelimbs and hindlimbs were studied. Movement of the animals in response to perturbation were highly stereotyped and consisted of two phases: (1) motion of the feet during platform movement while the trunk remained relatively stationary followed by (2) active correction of posture by movement of the trunk in the direction of perturbation. Vertical force changes occurred after the perturbation was well underway (latency 65 ms) and were related to the displacement of the center of mass and active correction of trunk position. Shear forces showed both passive (inertial) and active components and suggested that the majority of the torque necessary for postural correction was generated by the hindlimb. EMG responses in forelimb and shoulder muscles were most correlated with increase in vertical force, showing a generalized co-contraction in tailward translation (when these limbs were loaded) and little activity when the forelimbs were unloaded. EMG responses in hindlimb showed reciprocal activation of agonists and antagonists during perturbation with strong synergies of thigh and foot flexors in tailward translation and thigh and foot extensors in headward translation. The forelimb EMG patterns were most consistent with the conclusion that the forelimb is used primarily for vertical support during perturbation. It was concluded that hindlimb EMG responses were appropriate for both vertical support and performance of the postural correction. The hindlimb muscle synergies observed during translation are the "mirror image" of those observed in humans by other workers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6641850     DOI: 10.1007/BF00238231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  11 in total

1.  Coordination of movements of the kindlimbs and forelimbs in different forms of locomotion in normal and decerebrate cats.

Authors:  S Miller; J Van Der Burg; F Van Der Meché
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1975-06-27       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  POSTURAL STABILITY IN THE DOG.

Authors:  J M BROOKHART; P L PARMEGGIANI; W A PETERSEN; S A STONE
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1965-06

3.  Climbing fiber responses of cerebellar Purkinje cells to passive movement of the cat forepaw.

Authors:  D S Rushmer; W J Roberts; G K Augter
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-04-16       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Characteristics of the postural reactions of the dog to a controlled disturbance.

Authors:  S Mori; J M Brookhart
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1968-08

5.  Contribution of pedal afferents to postural control in the dog.

Authors:  S Mori; P J Reynolds; J M Brookhart
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1970-03

6.  Postural reactions to two directions of displacement in dogs.

Authors:  J M Brookhart; S Mori; P J Reynolds
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1970-03

7.  Biomechanical and electromyographical comparison of two postural supporting mechanisms in the cat.

Authors:  M Dufossé; J Macpherson; J Massion
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Anatomy and innervation patterns of cat lateral gastrocnemius and plantaris muscles.

Authors:  A W English; W D Letbetter
Journal:  Am J Anat       Date:  1982-05

9.  Fixed patterns of rapid postural responses among leg muscles during stance.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1977-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  13 in total

1.  The control of limb geometry in cat posture.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; M Le Taillanter; L Lopiano; C Maioli
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Head acceleration following linear translations in the freely-standing cat.

Authors:  J T Inglis; J M Macpherson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Functionally complex muscles of the cat hindlimb. III. Differential activation within biceps femoris during postural perturbations.

Authors:  C M Chanaud; J M Macpherson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Automatic postural responses in the cat: responses of hindlimb muscles to horizontal perturbations of stance in multiple directions.

Authors:  D S Rushmer; S P Moore; S L Windus; C J Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Robotic force platform for the study of posture and stance in the quadruped.

Authors:  A van Eyken; S Perlin; D W Lywood; J M Macpherson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Automatic postural responses in the cat: responses of proximal and distal hindlimb muscles to drop of support from a single hind- or forelimb.

Authors:  D S Rushmer; J M Macpherson; D C Dunbar; C J Russell; S L Windus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Cat posture on a tilted platform.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; C Maioli; E Fava
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Characteristics of posture alterations associated with a stepping movement in cats.

Authors:  F P Kolb; W H Fischer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Stance dependence of automatic postural adjustments in humans.

Authors:  J M Macpherson; F B Horak; D C Dunbar; R S Dow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Postural responses in the cat to unexpected rotations of the supporting surface: evidence for a centrally generated synergic organization.

Authors:  J M Macpherson; D S Rushmer; D C Dunbar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.