Literature DB >> 6641479

Non-fusable stimuli and the role of binocular inhibition in normal and pathologic vision, especially strabismus.

M Fahle.   

Abstract

Stimuli on corresponding points of both retinae that cannot be fused may cause binocular rivalry: the stimuli suppress each other alternately. This effect was used to study the influence of image sharpness upon binocular inhibition. Blurring an image means decreasing its contrast and attenuating its high spatial frequencies. Both factors diminish the time that a stimulus is perceived during rivalry. This fact has implications both for normal vision--as objects off the horopter are normally blurred--and for disturbed vision when the image of one or both eyes is (locally) deteriorated. In both cases, the binocular field of view can be combined from the 'good' parts of both eyes. Hence, the field of view may consist, in a piece-meal fashion, of parts stemming from the right or the left eye exclusively and others where both images are superimposed. We present evidence for the hypothesis that there is a common neural mechanism causing both binocular rivalry and functional amblyopia in anisometropia and strabismus. Consequences of the results on rivalry suppression for the pathophysiology and therapy of strabismic amblyopia are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6641479     DOI: 10.1007/BF00161288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  78 in total

1.  Receptive fields of ganglion cells in the cat's retina.

Authors:  T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1960-10       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Inhibitory binocular interaction in human vision and a possible mechanism subserving stereoscopic fusion.

Authors:  K H Ruddock; E Wigley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-04-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  [Results of penalisation treatment (author's transl)].

Authors:  N Stärk; E Popp
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 0.700

4.  [Our experiences with penalisation in the therapy of functional amblyopia].

Authors:  A Catros; A Garrec
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 0.700

5.  Visually evoked responses in alternating strabismus.

Authors:  A T Franceschetti; H M Burian
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Binocular competition in the control of geniculate cell growth.

Authors:  R W Guillery
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Spatio-temporal organization of receptive fields of the cat striate cortex. The receptive fields as the grating filters.

Authors:  V D Glezer; T A Tsherbach; V E Gauselman; V M Bondarko
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Binocular rivalry: the effects of orientation and pattern color arrangement.

Authors:  J Thomas
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-04

9.  Binocular rivalry: suppression depends on orientation and spatial frequency.

Authors:  M Fahle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens.

Authors:  T N Wiesel; D H Hubel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-11       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Physiology of suppression in strabismic amblyopia.

Authors:  R Harrad; F Sengpiel; C Blakemore
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  [Why two eyes?].

Authors:  M Fahle
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1987-08

3.  Physiological suppression demonstrated with the Aulhorn PDH.

Authors:  M A Breedijk; M F Hoogesteger; G L van der Heijde
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Interocular suppression in normal and amblyopic subjects: the effect of unilateral attenuation with neutral density filters.

Authors:  U Leonards; R Sireteanu
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-07

5.  Why is Binocular Rivalry Uncommon? Discrepant Monocular Images in the Real World.

Authors:  Derek Henry Arnold
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  I Agree: Binocular Rivalry Stimuli are Common but Rivalry is Not.

Authors:  Derek Henry Arnold
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Binocular Rivalry Measured 2 Hours After Occlusion Therapy Predicts the Recovery Rate of the Amblyopic Eye in Anisometropic Children.

Authors:  Claudia Lunghi; Maria Concetta Morrone; Jacopo Secci; Roberto Caputo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Binocular temporal visual processing in myopia.

Authors:  Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz; Peter J Bex; Adriana Ferreira; Anna Kosovicheva
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.