Literature DB >> 6641460

Experience with the one-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse.

R Friedman, M Muggia-Sulam, H R Freund.   

Abstract

Our experience with 27 patients undergoing 33 Altemeier procedures for repair of rectal prolapse is presented. The overall recurrence rate during a 1- to 17-year follow-up period is 35 per cent (per patients) or 50 per cent (per operations). There was no mortality and only minimal morbidity, although we were dealing with an elderly group of patients (average age 61 years) with many associated diseases (2.8 diseases per patient). Of 13 patients with successful anatomic repair, ten described it as a success, one developed an anal stricture, and two patients claimed only partial success, despite a perfect anatomic repair, due to lack of improved continence. Our results with the Altemeier procedure for the repair of rectal prolapse are unsatisfactory. However, as the procedure is well tolerated by elderly and sick patients, it should be reserved for those.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6641460     DOI: 10.1007/BF02554750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  7 in total

1.  Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for gangrenous rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Ioannis Voulimeneas; Constantine Antonopoulos; Evangelos Alifierakis; Pavlos Ioannides
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Perineal approaches to rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Mari A Madsen
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-05

3.  Coloanal anastomosis using a circular stapling device following perineal rectosigmoidectomy for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  J Hida; M Yasutomi; T Maruyama; A Nakajima; T Uchida; T Wakano; T Tokoro; R Kubo; H Umemura; K Shindo
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Outcome analysis of elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Tilman Laubert; Franz G Bader; Markus Kleemann; Hamed Esnaashari; Ralf Bouchard; Philipp Hildebrand; Erik Schlöricke; Hans-Peter Bruch; Uwe J Roblick
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy vs. rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  P Luukkonen; U Mikkonen; H Järvinen
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Controversy in the treatment of symptomatic internal rectal prolapse: suspension or resection?

Authors:  S Festen; A A W van Geloven; A D'Hoore; I Lindsey; M F Gerhards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for rectal prolapse-the preferred procedure for the unfit elderly patient? 10 years experience from a UK tertiary centre.

Authors:  M Alwahid; S R Knight; H Wadhawan; K L Campbell; D Ziyaie; S M P Koch
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.781

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.