Literature DB >> 6640401

Substitution of the "group-and-screen" for the full crossmatch in elective operations.

J G Kelton, R A Perrault, M A Blajchman.   

Abstract

For many years, the crossmatch has served as the pretransfusion determinant of compatibility between recipient and donor. The majority of units of blood crossmatched for elective surgical procedures are not used and many antibodies detected in the crossmatch are not of clinical significance. Motivated by the need to eliminate testing that does not significantly enhance the provision of a safe product, the necessity for doing crossmatches has been questioned. Recent studies indicate that the substitution of the "group-and-screen" for the complete crossmatch represents an acceptable approach to the provision of blood for many elective surgical procedures. The benefit of this approach is significant: blood is utilized more efficiently and the blood bank has a reduction in workload. The risk is very minimal: only one of several thousand transfusions will be given to patients with previously undetected alloantibodies; and recent evidence indicates that such incompatibilities have little clinical impact.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6640401     DOI: 10.1007/BF03015236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J        ISSN: 0008-2856


  11 in total

1.  The maximum surgical blood order schedule and surgical blood use in the United States.

Authors:  B A Friedman; H A Oberman; A R Chadwick; K I Kingdon
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  The risk of abbreviating the major crossmatch in urgent or massive transfusion.

Authors:  H A Oberman; B A Barnes; B A Friedman
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1978 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 3.  Blood component therapy in anaesthetic practice.

Authors:  M A Blajchman; R Herst; R A Perrault
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1983-07

4.  Transfusion-associated fatalities: review of Bureau of Biologics reports 1976-1978.

Authors:  C L Honig; J R Bove
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1980 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  The role of compatibility tests. (Report of a meeting sponsored by the Bureau of Biologics for the Blood Products Advisory Committee).

Authors:  G Garratty
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1982 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Pretransfusion tests and compatibility: questions of safety and efficacy.

Authors:  S P Masouredis
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Serum alanine aminotransferase of donors in relation to the risk of non-A,non-B hepatitis in recipients: the transfusion-transmitted viruses study.

Authors:  R D Aach; W Szmuness; J W Mosley; F B Hollinger; R A Kahn; C E Stevens; V M Edwards; J Werch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-04-23       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Reorganization of blood ordering practices.

Authors:  C Rouault; J Gruenhagen
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  The type and screen: a safe alternative and supplement in selected surgical procedures.

Authors:  L I Boral; J B Henry
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Do you think that the cross match with donor red cells can be omitted when the serum of a patient has been tested for the presence of red cell alloantibodies with a cell panel?

Authors: 
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.144

View more
  2 in total

1.  Changing patterns of transfusion practice in a tertiary care hospital from 1977 to 1984.

Authors:  J Freedman; C Lim; J Wright
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-07

2.  Good laboratory practice before blood transfusion.

Authors:  B P Moore
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-06-01       Impact factor: 8.262

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.