Literature DB >> 6639193

Multivessel coronary revascularization without saphenous vein: long-term results of bilateral internal mammary artery grafting.

B W Lytle, D M Cosgrove, G L Saltus, P C Taylor, F D Loop.   

Abstract

When the saphenous vein is absent or inadequate, options for multivessel coronary revascularization include bilateral mammary artery grafting and the use of conduits of unproven durability (arm vein, homologous umbilical vein, prosthetic graft). To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of bilateral mammary artery grafting, we reviewed the cases of 76 consecutive patients with multivessel disease (33 with two-vessel disease, 43 with three-vessel disease) who underwent revascularization with bilateral mammary artery grafts only during the period from 1971 to 1980. No hospital deaths occurred. Thirty-three free and 119 in situ grafts were used. Late follow-up was complete, ranging from 12 to 132 months (mean interval, 67 months) and revealed improvement by at least one New York Heart Association functional class in 59 of 71 survivors. Postoperative arteriograms (mean interval, 26 months) of 55 grafts in 28 patients showed that 49 grafts were patent (89%). Five late deaths (2 noncardiac) occurred. Actuarial survival was 97.2% to seven years and 90.2% at nine years after operation. Bilateral mammary artery grafting yielded excellent graft patency, relief of symptoms, and long-term survival. When saphenous vein is unsuitable for grafting, bilateral mammary artery grafts should be utilized before other conduits are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6639193     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)60684-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  14 in total

Review 1.  Pedicled or skeletonized? A review of the internal thoracic artery graft.

Authors:  Carlos Del Campo
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2003

2.  Extending the use of autologous arterial conduits in myocardial revascularisation.

Authors:  G D Angelini; A J Bryan
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-08

3.  Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting.

Authors:  Bruce W Lytle
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

4.  Bilateral Versus Single Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafting: Do We Have the Answer?

Authors:  Frank W Sellke
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Thirty-year experience with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: where have we been and where are we going?

Authors:  Paul Kurlansky
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Suitability and durability of multiple internal thoracic artery coronary artery bypasses.

Authors:  J W Jones; S E Schmidt; R Miller; C Nahas; A C Beall
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Augmentation of coronary bypass graft flow induced by dipyridamole and its relation to bypass graft patency.

Authors:  H Suma; A Takeuchi; S Sasaki; K Asada; M Suwa; Y Hirota
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1988-03

8.  A comparison of early mortality and morbidity after single and bilateral internal mammary artery grafting with the free right internal mammary artery.

Authors:  S S Ashraf; N Shaukat; K Akhtar; H Love; J Shaw; D J Rowlands; D Keenan
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1994-10

9.  Multivessel coronary revascularization with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts.

Authors:  T Murakami; K Kino; Y Kioka; S Arai; K Kurozumi; Y Nakayama; S Indoh; Y Senoo; S Teramoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Angiographic 20-year follow-up of 61 consecutive patients with internal thoracic artery grafts.

Authors:  S M Voutilainen; A A Järvinen; K A Verkkala; P E Keto; L O Heikkinen; P E Voutilainen; P T Harjola
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.