Literature DB >> 6637894

Evaluation of ames Multistix-SG for urine specific gravity versus refractometer specific gravity.

L J Adams.   

Abstract

A comparison of urine specific gravity by a commercially available multiple reagent strip (Multistix-SG; Ames Division, Miles Laboratory) versus refractometer specific gravity (TS Meter; American Optical Corporation) was performed on 214 routine urine specimens. Agreement to +/- 0.005 was found in 72% of the specimens (r = 0.80). Urine specific gravity by the Multistix-SG showed a significant positive bias at urine pHs less than or equal to 6.0 and a negative bias at urine pHs greater than 7.0 in comparison to refractometer specific gravity. At concentrated (specific gravity greater than or equal to 1.020) specific gravities, up to 25% of urine specimens were misclassified as not concentrated by Multistix-SG specific gravity in comparison to refractometer specific gravity. The additional cost of the specific gravity reagent to a multiple reagent test strip in addition to the poor performance relative to refractometer specific gravity leads to the conclusion that including this specific gravity methodology on a multiple reagent strip is neither cost effective nor clinically useful.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6637894     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/80.6.871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  6 in total

1.  Dipstick measurements of urine specific gravity are unreliable.

Authors:  A S de Buys Roessingh; A Drukker; J P Guignard
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Comparison of 3 Methods to Assess Urine Specific Gravity in Collegiate Wrestlers.

Authors:  Kristin J. Stuempfle; Daniel G. Drury
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Is specific gravity a good estimate of urine osmolality?

Authors:  Sethi Imran; Goldwater Eva; Shutty Christopher; Ethan Flynn; David Henner
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Performance Evaluation of Three URiSCAN Devices for Routine Urinalysis.

Authors:  Kiwoong Ko; Min-Jung Kwon; Seungho Ryu; Hee-Yeon Woo; Hyosoon Park
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  Clinical utility of urine specific gravity, electrical conductivity, and color as on-farm methods for evaluating urine concentration in dairy cattle.

Authors:  Ameer A Megahed; Walter Grünberg; Peter D Constable
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Evaluation and analytical validation of a handheld digital refractometer for urine specific gravity measurement.

Authors:  Sara P Wyness; Joshua J H Hunsaker; Taylor M Snow; Jonathan R Genzen
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2016-06-02
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.