Literature DB >> 6637823

Progression of isolated aortic stenosis: analysis of 29 patients having more than 1 cardiac catheterization.

P F Nestico, N L DePace, D Kimbiris, A H Hakki, B Khanderia, A S Iskandrian, B Segal.   

Abstract

Factors related to progression of nonrheumatic aortic stenosis (AS) were analyzed in 29 adult patients who underwent serial hemodynamic studies over a mean of 71 months. AS was congenital in 8 patients and degenerative in 21. The patients were divided into 2 groups on the basis of the change in aortic valve area between the 2 studies. Twelve patients had a greater than or equal to 25% reduction in aortic valve area (Group I) and 17 patients had less than 25% decrease in aortic valve area (Group II). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in age, interval between studies, cardiac output, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, left ventricular peak systolic pressure and origin of AS (congenital or degenerative). Group I patients had significantly larger initial aortic valve areas than did Group II patients (1.3 +/- 0.9 cm2 versus 0.8 +/- 0.4 cm2, p = 0.02). Also, the initial peak transaortic pressure gradients were lower in Group I than in Group II (27 +/- 19 versus 58 +/- 38 mm Hg, p = 0.01). Group I patients had a significantly greater increase in pressure gradient and a greater reduction in cardiac output than did Group II patients (24 +/- 21 mm Hg in Group I versus -0.1 +/- 24.5 mm Hg in Group II, p = 0.01, and -1.0 +/- 1.3 liters/min in Group I versus 0.10 +/- 1.4 liters/min in Group II, p = 0.03). Thus, AS progressed in 41% of a selected group of patients who underwent repeated cardiac catheterization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6637823     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90531-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

Review 1.  Should patients with asymptomatic mild or moderate aortic stenosis undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery also have valve replacement for their aortic stenosis?

Authors:  S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Inaccuracies in using aortic valve gradients alone to grade severity of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  M J Griffith; C Carey; D J Coltart; B S Jenkins; M M Webb-Peploe
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1989-11

3.  Prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  J P Ottervanger; K Thomas; T H Sie; M M P Haalebos; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Rapid progression of mitral and aortic stenosis in a patient with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  K Fujise; R Amerling; W Sherman
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-09

5.  Canine congenital aortic stenosis: A review of the literature and commentary.

Authors:  M R O'grady; D L Holmberg; C W Miller; J R Cockshutt
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.008

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.