Literature DB >> 6630308

DNA density in mitotic and meiotic metaphase chromosomes of plants and animals.

M D Bennett, J S Heslop-Harrison, J B Smith, J P Ward.   

Abstract

Studies of chromosome disposition at metaphase using serial thin-sectioning and three-dimensional reconstruction techniques have produced accurate estimates of the total volume of chromosomes per cell in 15 plant and two animal species. Comparing this character with the 4C DNA amount showed no indiction of systemic differences in DNA density between either organisms with widely different (greater than 200-fold) C values or different groups or organisms. For example, there was no significant difference between the density of DNA in somatic metaphase chromosomes of man (0.141 pg/micrometers3) and its mean in 14 angiosperm plant species (0.182 pg/micrometers3), or between four dicotyledons (0.180 pg/miocrometers3) and 10 monocotyledons (0.182 pg/micrometers3). However, evidence was found showing that DNA density can vary significantly within a species. Thus, although the total chromosome volume per cell was closely correlated (r greater than 0.97) with 4C DNA amount in somatic and meiotic cells, the density of DNA in metaphase chromosomes was significantly lower in meiocytes (0.131 pg/micrometers3) than in somatic metaphase cells (0.19 pg/micrometers3).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6630308     DOI: 10.1242/jcs.63.1.173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  13 in total

Review 1.  The large genome constraint hypothesis: evolution, ecology and phenotype.

Authors:  Charles A Knight; Nicole A Molinari; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Genome size evolution in relation to leaf strategy and metabolic rates revisited.

Authors:  Jeremy M Beaulieu; Ilia J Leitch; Charles A Knight
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Cytochemistry and C-values: the less-well-known world of nuclear DNA amounts.

Authors:  J Greilhuber
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Genome size in Hieracium subgenus Hieracium (Asteraceae) is strongly correlated with major phylogenetic groups.

Authors:  Jindrich Chrtek; Jaroslav Zahradnícek; Karol Krak; Judith Fehrer
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Monoparametric models of flow cytometric karyotypes with spreadsheet software.

Authors:  J Conia; P Muller; S Brown; C Bergounioux; P Gadal
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  The volumes and morphology of human chromosomes in mitotic reconstructions.

Authors:  J S Heslop-Harrison; A R Leitch; T Schwarzacher; J B Smith; M D Atkinson; M D Bennett
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Irregular Chromatin: Packing Density, Fiber Width, and Occurrence of Heterogeneous Clusters.

Authors:  Gaurav Bajpai; Ranjith Padinhateeri
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.033

8.  Comparisons with Caenorhabditis (approximately 100 Mb) and Drosophila (approximately 175 Mb) using flow cytometry show genome size in Arabidopsis to be approximately 157 Mb and thus approximately 25% larger than the Arabidopsis genome initiative estimate of approximately 125 Mb.

Authors:  Michael D Bennett; Ilia J Leitch; H James Price; J Spencer Johnston
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  High resolution bands in maize chromosomes by G-banding methods.

Authors:  K Kakeda; H Yamagata; K Fukui; M Ohno; K Fukui; Z Z Wei; E S Zhu
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  DNA topoisomerase II activity in nonreplicating, transcriptionally inactive, chicken late spermatids.

Authors:  J Roca; C Mezquita
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.