Electrocochleography and brainstem potentials in the diagnosis of the deaf child.

The deaf child must receive sound amplification before he reaches the age of two years. At this age the hearing threshold is best measured objectively by electrocochleography (ECochG) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) audiometry. When used correctly, both methods allow an exact threshold estimation which is informative enough for adequate hearing aid prescription. Both methods have advantages and disadvantages when used in children. The advantages of ECochG are: (a) a more exact threshold estimation and (b) strictly monaural evaluation. The advantages of ABR are: (a) ease of performance; it is not invasive and does not require general anaesthesia and (b) allows for exploration of higher levels in the auditory pathway up to the midbrain. We believe that ECochG and ABR are compatible and complementary in the diagnosis of childhood deafness. ABR could be used in first instance, while ECochG could be reserved for doubtful cases and for those who cannot be adequately sedated. Extra-audiological factors such as the availability of anaesthetists and varying hospital facilities, play a further role in determining the choice of electric response technique.