Literature DB >> 6629112

Studies of the 'mucus-bicarbonate' barrier on rat fundic mucosa: the effects of luminal pH and a stable prostaglandin analogue.

I N Ross, L A Turnberg.   

Abstract

Gastric mucosa may protect itself from acid peptic digestion by maintaining an alkaline barrier zone within the layer of mucus coating its surface. We have measured the pH gradient in the mucous layer in vivo, on the gastric mucosa of anaesthetised rats using antimony chloride micro pH electrodes. The maximum pH recordable adjacent to the epithelium was 7.43 +/- 0.56 (n = 8) when the luminal bathing solution pH was 2. Adjusting the luminal pH to 7.0 caused the maximal pH to rise to 7.88 (range 7.59 to 8.08), a value which is significantly higher than either luminal or reported intraepithelial pH and suggests that active secretion of alkali is involved. Pretreatment with 16-16-dimethyl prostaglandin E2 (20 micrograms subcutaneously) significantly increased the maximal intramucus pH to 7.89 +/- 0.45 (n = 8) when luminal pH was 2 and prevented the fall in intramucus pH induced by luminal aspirin (20 mM). It did not prevent falls in pH provoked by the mucolytic agent n-acetyl cysteine or by a high luminal activity (pH 1.4). These data indicate that an alkaline environment is maintained adjacent to gastric mucosa and that while this is enhanced by prostaglandin it may be compromised by high luminal acid concentrations or by removal of the support provided by mucus. These observations may be relevant to the mechanisms of gastric mucosal protection against acid peptic damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6629112      PMCID: PMC1420124          DOI: 10.1136/gut.24.11.1030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  16 in total

1.  Manufacture and utilization of antimony pH electrodes.

Authors:  C R Caflisch; L R Pucacco; N W Carter
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Epithelial cell turnover and mucus production in man.

Authors:  D N Croft; W Domschke; S Domschke; J Hagel; L Demling
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Stimulation of alkaline secretion in amphibian-isolated gastric mucosa by 16,16-dimethyl PGE2 and PGF2 alpha. A proposed explanation for some of the cytoprotective actions of prostaglandins.

Authors:  A Garner; J R Heylings
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  Mucus and bicarbonate secretion in the stomach and their possible role in mucosal protection.

Authors:  A Allen; A Garner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Prostaglandins and digestive diseases.

Authors:  A Robert
Journal:  Adv Prostaglandin Thromboxane Res       Date:  1980

6.  Demonstration of a pH gradient across mucus adherent to rabbit gastric mucosa: evidence for a 'mucus-bicarbonate' barrier.

Authors:  S E Williams; L A Turnberg
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Effect of the acid secretory state on intramural pH of rabbit gastric mucosa.

Authors:  E Kivilaakso; D Fromm; W Silen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Effects of acetylsalicylate on alkalinization, acid secretion and electrogenic properties in the isolated gastric mucosa.

Authors:  A Garner
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1977-03

9.  Effects of fasting, stress and drugs on gastric glycoprotein synthesis in the rat.

Authors:  J B Dekanski; A Macdonald; P Sacra
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 8.739

10.  Gastric gel mucus thickness: effect of distention, 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin e2, and carbenoxolone.

Authors:  M Bickel; G L Kauffman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  9 in total

1.  Loss of downregulated in adenoma (DRA) impairs mucosal HCO3(-) secretion in murine ileocolonic inflammation.

Authors:  Fang Xiao; Marina Juric; Junhua Li; Brigitte Riederer; Sunil Yeruva; Anurag Kumar Singh; Lifei Zheng; Silke Glage; George Kollias; Pradeep Dudeja; De-An Tian; Gang Xu; Jinxia Zhu; Oliver Bachmann; Ursula Seidler
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 5.325

2.  Endogenous cyclo-oxygenase activity regulates mouse gastric surface pH.

Authors:  Heidi K Baumgartner; Uzay Kirbiyik; Tamer Coskun; Shaoyou Chu; Marshall H Montrose
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Mucus-bicarbonate barrier--shield or sieve.

Authors:  W D Rees
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Bicarbonate (HCO3) delivery to the gastroduodenal mucosa by the blood: its importance for mucosal integrity.

Authors:  M Starlinger; R Schiessel
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Dynamic regulation of gastric surface pH by luminal pH.

Authors:  S Chu; S Tanaka; J D Kaunitz; M H Montrose
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Inhibitors of acid secretion can benefit gastric wound repair independent of luminal pH effects on the site of damage.

Authors:  Elise S Demitrack; Eitaro Aihara; Susan Kenny; Andrea Varro; Marshall H Montrose
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Effect of cimetidine and omeprazole on aspirin- and taurocholate-induced gastric mucosal damage in the rat.

Authors:  R J Utley; A S Salim; D C Carter
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Duodenal mucosa synthesis of prostaglandins in duodenal ulcer disease.

Authors:  K Hillier; C L Smith; R Jewell; M J Arthur; G Ross
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  High systemic HCO3(-) and topical 16,16-dimethyl-PGE2 protect gastric mucosa against luminal acid by enhancing its preepithelial buffer capacity.

Authors:  T Ranta-Knuuttila; H Mustonen; E Kivilaakso
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.