Literature DB >> 6628637

What U.S. women think and do about contraception.

J D Forrest, S K Henshaw.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6628637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect        ISSN: 0014-7354


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  The contraceptive transition in Flanders.

Authors:  R Cliquet; E Lodewijckx
Journal:  Eur J Popul       Date:  1986-05

2.  A social learning model of adolescent contraceptive behavior.

Authors:  M L Balassone
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  1991-12

3.  Associations between recent contraceptive use and quality of life among women.

Authors:  Sanithia L Williams; Sara M Parisi; Rachel Hess; E Bimla Schwarz
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Measuring contraceptive values: an alternative approach.

Authors:  C A Nickerson; G H McClelland; D M Petersen
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1991-06

5.  The impact of legalized abortion on adolescent childbearing in New York City.

Authors:  T J Joyce; N H Mocan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  ACOG reflects on the National Natality and Fetal Mortality Surveys.

Authors:  E Nichols
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Patterns of contraceptive method of use by California family planning clinic clients, 1976-84.

Authors:  B M Aved
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  The public and the pill: is the pill making a comeback?

Authors:  J D Forrest
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The role of family support in determining developmental outcomes in children of teen mothers.

Authors:  M L Cooley; D G Unger
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  1991
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.