Literature DB >> 6628585

Comparison of a 750 ml spacer and a nebulizer in domiciliary treatment of severe chronic asthma with terbutaline.

L C Laursen, E P Munch, E Weeke, K G Hidinger.   

Abstract

Twelve patients with severe chronic obstructive lung disease, participated in this double-blind, cross-over study. Either terbutaline sulphate aerosol or placebo was delivered via a pressurized aerosol with a 750 ml spacer interposed between the actuator and the mouth, or by an electric compressor nebulizer. Each treatment was given for 1 week. The patients recorded PEF and the use of extra terbutaline aerosol while treating themselves at home. All patients completed the treatment periods on terbutaline. Five patients failed to complete the placebo treatment periods because their condition deteriorated. There was no significant difference in bronchodilatation with 5 mg terbutaline using the nebulizer versus 1.5 mg terbutaline using the spacer. We conclude that in the treatment of severe asthma, a pressurized aerosol with a 750 ml spacer can be used either alone, or as a supplement to, treatment with an electric compressor nebulizer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6628585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Respir Dis        ISSN: 0106-4339


  3 in total

Review 1.  Inhaler devices for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive airways disease (COPD).

Authors:  J Wright; D Brocklebank; F Ram
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

2.  Asthma care in general practice--time for revolution?

Authors:  K Jones
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Spacer devices for metered dose inhalers.

Authors:  Stephen P Newman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.