Literature DB >> 6627219

Estrogen and progesterone receptor assays on breast carcinoma from mastectomy specimens.

J S Meyer, K Schechtman, R Valdes.   

Abstract

To determine whether autolytic loss of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptors might affect results of assays performed on primary carcinoma samples taken from fresh mastectomy specimens rather than from biopsy specimens, a group of 71 cases were examined, in which both types of samples were assayed. The comparisons showed a small significant reduction in the proportion of positive ER assay results in mastectomy-primary specimens compared with biopsy specimens, although the frequency of high-binding ER results in the mastectomy-primary specimens was not reduced. The number of positive PgR assays on mastectomy-primary specimens was not reduced in comparison with biopsy specimens. Correlation coefficients for ER values in the paired data were r = 0.836 for biopsy versus mastectomy, and r = 0.795 for primary tumor versus nodal metastasis. For PgR biopsy versus mastectomy r = 0.664, and for PgR primary versus node r = 0.352. The mean quantitative ER and PgR values were significantly higher in axillary lymph nodal metastases than in primary carcinomas, and the higher nodal receptor levels were explained in part by significantly higher tumor cellularity. It is concluded that while loss of ER sufficient to cause a false-negative interpretation may possibly occur in a few cases during the course of mastectomy, as a general rule, significant losses do not occur. The performance of assays on axillary metastases in mastectomy specimens is advantageous because of their high cellularity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6627219     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19831201)52:11<2139::aid-cncr2820521127>3.0.co;2-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  4 in total

1.  Breast cancer hormone receptor assay results of core needle biopsy and modified radical mastectomy specimens from the same patients.

Authors:  Gemma B Uy; Adriano V Laudico; Jose M Carnate; Frederick G Lim; Arnold M Fernandez; Rona R Rivera; Cynthia A Mapua; Richard R Love
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Cost-effectiveness of fine needle biopsy of the breast.

Authors:  D R Lannin; J F Silverman; C Walker; W J Pories
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Prognostic implication of estrogen receptor content in breast cancer.

Authors:  H O Adami; S Graffman; A Lindgren; J Sällström
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  The Effect of Cold Ischemia Time and/or Formalin Fixation on Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Results in Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Melike Pekmezci; Anna Szpaderska; Clodia Osipo; Cağatay Erşahin
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2012-03-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.