Literature DB >> 6626779

Tinnitus pitch: a comparison of three measurement methods.

R S Tyler, D Conrad-Armes.   

Abstract

The most prominent pitch of tinnitus was measured in 10 subjects with sensorineural tinnitus. The pitch was determined with three different psychophysical procedures in the ear ipsilateral to the tinnitus; an Adaptive Method (Bracketing), a Method of Limits (ascending and descending), and the Method of Adjustment. Each procedure involved equating the pitch of a pure tone to the most prominent tinnitus pitch, and was repeated seven times on each subject. Although there was no statistically significant difference for the means and standard deviations among the different methods for the group data, there were some large differences in a few individuals. Many of the subjects produced pitch matches that covered a range of 1 octave, whereas others showed better consistency. The Method of Limits took longer to perform and resulted in more octave confusions than the other two methods. The Adaptive Method was also repeated five times for each subject in the ear contralateral to the tinnitus. Two subjects produced a tinnitus pitch match that was over 1/2 octave lower in the contralateral ear. We recommend that tinnitus pitch be measured in the ipsilateral ear with either the Method of Adjustment or the Adaptive Method. Because some patients are unreliable in their pitch matching we suggest repeating the match seven to nine times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6626779     DOI: 10.3109/03005368309078916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Audiol        ISSN: 0300-5364


  15 in total

1.  Individual Reliability of the Standard Clinical Method vs Patient-Centered Tinnitus Likeness Rating for Assessment of Tinnitus Pitch and Loudness Matching.

Authors:  Sylvie Hébert
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Phase-shift treatment for tinnitus of cochlear origin.

Authors:  Olivier Meeus; Karen Heyndrickx; Peggy Lambrechts; Dirk De Ridder; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  A Bayesian perspective on tinnitus pitch matching.

Authors:  Garnett P McMillan; Emily J Thielman; Krystyn Wypych; James A Henry
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Relationship between Audiometric slope and tinnitus pitch in tinnitus patients: insights into the mechanisms of tinnitus generation.

Authors:  Martin Schecklmann; Veronika Vielsmeier; Thomas Steffens; Michael Landgrebe; Berthold Langguth; Tobias Kleinjung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Music-induced cortical plasticity and lateral inhibition in the human auditory cortex as foundations for tonal tinnitus treatment.

Authors:  Christo Pantev; Hidehiko Okamoto; Henning Teismann
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-27

Review 6.  Maladaptive neural synchrony in tinnitus: origin and restoration.

Authors:  Jos J Eggermont; Peter A Tass
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  The Gap Detection Test: Can It Be Used to Diagnose Tinnitus?

Authors:  Kris Boyen; Deniz Başkent; Pim van Dijk
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Changes in the response properties of inferior colliculus neurons relating to tinnitus.

Authors:  Joel I Berger; Ben Coomber; Tobias T Wells; Mark N Wallace; Alan R Palmer
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Direct current stimulation of the ear in tinnitus treatment: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.

Authors:  Marzena Mielczarek; Jurek Olszewski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Psychoacoustic assessment to improve tinnitus diagnosis.

Authors:  Charles-Édouard Basile; Philippe Fournier; Sean Hutchins; Sylvie Hébert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.