Literature DB >> 6625103

Clinical evaluation of olfaction.

W S Cain, J Gent, F A Catalanotto, R B Goodspeed.   

Abstract

An odor identification test and an odor threshold test offered satisfactory quantitative information on olfactory function in patients with chemosensory complaints. The threshold test used various concentrations of butanol presented in an ascending sequence. On each trial, the participant had to choose between stimulus and blank (two-alternative forced-choice procedure). The identification test used common odorous items (e.g., baby powder and ground coffee) and pungent items (e.g., ammonia) to test trigeminal function. A list of odor names and use of corrective feedback during testing overcame word-finding difficulty in odor identification. Each test readily distinguished between patients and control subjects. At present, a score that reflects the combined outcome of the tests is used to indicate five categories of functioning: normal osmesis, mild hyposmia, moderate hyposmia, severe hyposmia, and anosmia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6625103     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0709(83)80068-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0196-0709            Impact factor:   1.808


  41 in total

1.  Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper.

Authors:  Glenis Scadding; Peter Hellings; Isam Alobid; Claus Bachert; Wytske Fokkens; Roy Gerth van Wijk; Philippe Gevaert; Josep Guilemany; Livije Kalogjera; Valerie Lund; Joaquim Mullol; Giovanni Passalacqua; Elina Toskala; Cornelius van Drunen
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 5.871

2.  Olfactory ERPs in an odor/visual congruency task differentiate ApoE ε4 carriers from non-carriers.

Authors:  Joel Kowalewski; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 3.  Olfactory dysfunction and its measurement in the clinic and workplace.

Authors:  Richard L Doty
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 4.  Changes of Olfactory Performance during the Process of Aging - Psychophysical Testing and Its Relevance in the Fight against Malnutrition.

Authors:  W Gunzer
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Age-related functional changes in gustatory and reward processing regions: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Aaron Jacobson; Erin Green; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Males and females show differential brain activation to taste when hungry and sated in gustatory and reward areas.

Authors:  Lori Haase; Erin Green; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Neural correlates of taste and pleasantness evaluation in the metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Erin Green; Aaron Jacobson; Lori Haase; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Gross Olfaction Before and After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Carlos Zerrweck; Vannia Castañeda Gallardo; Carmen Calleja; Elisa Sepúlveda; Lizbeth Guilber
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Right-nostril advantage for discrimination of odors.

Authors:  R J Zatorre; M Jones-Gotman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-06

10.  Effect of Magnitude Estimation of Pleasantness and Intensity on fMRI Activation to Taste.

Authors:  B Cerf-Ducastel; L Haase; C Murphy
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.833

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.