Literature DB >> 6624691

A morphometric analysis of craniofacial growth and changes in spatial relations during secondary palatal development in human embryos and fetuses.

V M Diewert.   

Abstract

Staged human embryos and fetuses in the Carnegie Embryological Collection were morphometrically analyzed to show craniofacial dimensions and changes in spatial relations, and to identify patterns that would reflect normal developmental events during palatal formation. Normal embryos aged 7-8 weeks postconception (Streeter-O'Rahilly stages 19-23) and fetuses aged 9-10 weeks postconception, in eight groups with mean crown-rump (CR) lengths of 18-49 mm, were studied with cephalometric methods developed for histologic sections. In the 4-week period studied, facial dimensions increased predominantly in the sagittal plane with extensive changes in length (depth) and height, but limited changes in width. Growth of the mandible was more rapid than the nasomaxillary complex, and the length of Meckel's cartilage exceeded the length of the oronasal cavity at the time of horizontal movement of the shelves during stage 23. Simultaneously with shelf elevation, the upper craniofacial complex lifted, and the tongue and Meckel's cartilage extended forward beneath the primary palate. Analysis of spatial relations in the oronasal cavity showed that the palatomaxillary processes became separated from the tongue--mandibular complex as the head extended, and the tongue became positioned forward with growth of Meckel's cartilage. As the head position extended by 35 degrees, the cranial base angulation was unchanged and the primary palate maintained a 90 degrees position to the posterior cranial base. However, the sagittal position of the maxilla relative to the anterior cranial base increased by 20 degrees between stages 19 and 23. In the late embryonic and early fetal periods, the mean cranial base angulation of approximately 128 degrees and the mean maxillary position angulation of approximately 84 degrees were similar to the angulations previously shown to be present later prenatally and post-natally. The results suggest that human patterns of cranial base angulation and maxillary position to the cranial base develop during the late embryonic period when the chondrocranium and Meckel's cartilage form the primary skeleton.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6624691     DOI: 10.1002/aja.1001670407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Anat        ISSN: 0002-9106


  16 in total

1.  Cephalometric assessment of human fetal head specimens.

Authors:  R J Radlanski; K Heikinheimo; A Gruda
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Localisation of deformations of the midfacial complex in subjects with class III malocclusions employing thin-plate spline analysis.

Authors:  G D Singh; J A McNamara; S Lozanoff
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Analysis of human soft palate morphogenesis supports regional regulation of palatal fusion.

Authors:  Adrian Danescu; Melanie Mattson; Carly Dool; Virginia M Diewert; Joy M Richman
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  The human skull base angle during the second trimester of gestation.

Authors:  A S Dimitriadis; A Haritanti-Kouridou; K Antoniadis; L Ekonomou
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Shape changes during human fetal craniofacial growth.

Authors:  M J Trenouth
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Morphological deficiency in the prenatal anterior cranial base of midfacially retrognathic mice.

Authors:  W Ma; S Lozanoff
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 7.  Mechanisms that underlie co-variation of the brain and face.

Authors:  Ralph S Marcucio; Nathan M Young; Diane Hu; Benedikt Hallgrimsson
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 2.487

8.  The pattern of endocranial ontogenetic shape changes in humans.

Authors:  Simon Neubauer; Philipp Gunz; Jean-Jacques Hublin
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Craniofacial skeletal response to encephalization: How do we know what we think we know?

Authors:  Kate M Lesciotto; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.868

Review 10.  Facial Morphogenesis: Physical and Molecular Interactions Between the Brain and the Face.

Authors:  Ralph Marcucio; Benedikt Hallgrimsson; Nathan M Young
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.