Literature DB >> 6621623

Adjusted versus fixed-dose subcutaneous heparin in the prevention of deep-vein thrombosis after total hip replacement.

P F Leyvraz, J Richard, F Bachmann, G Van Melle, J M Treyvaud, J J Livio, G Candardjis.   

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement continues to be a serious problem. We conducted a study to determine whether adjustment of the dose of subcutaneous heparin to yield partial thromboplastin times in the high-normal range results in a greater reduction of postoperative deep-vein thrombosis than fixed doses of heparin. Seventy-nine patients undergoing elective hip arthroplasty were randomly divided into two groups two days before surgery. Group 1 (41 patients) received a fixed dose of 3500 IU of heparin subcutaneously ever eight hours; 16 of the 41 (39 per cent) had deep-vein thrombosis diagnosed by venography. Group 2 (38 patients) was started on the same dose, which was then adjusted to keep the activated partial thromboplastin time between 31.5 and 36 seconds. From the day of operation to the eighth postoperative day these patients needed progressively more heparin to maintain the activated partial thromboplastin time in the prescribed range. Only 5 of the 38 (13 per cent) had deep-vein thrombosis (P less than 0.01), and the number of thrombi in proximal veins was also lower in this group (P = 0.003). The number of units of blood transfused, the frequency of postoperative wound hematomas, and the drop in hemoglobin levels were identical in the two groups. Adjusted low-dose heparin prophylaxis appears to be a safe and efficacious method to reduce the frequency of deep-vein thrombosis in patients undergoing total hip replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6621623     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198310203091605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  34 in total

Review 1.  Preventing thromboembolic complications in older orthopaedic surgery patients: interventions and outcomes.

Authors:  J W Eikelboom; J S Ginsberg
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  [D-dimer screening in surgical long-term intensive care patients].

Authors:  P Hilbert; K Zur Nieden; R Stuttmann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Major orthopaedic surgery on the leg and thromboembolism.

Authors:  J Parker-Williams; R Vickers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-09-07

4.  Orthopaedic surgeons and thromboprophylaxis.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-09

Review 5.  Risk of and prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in hospital patients. Thromboembolic Risk Factors (THRIFT) Consensus Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-09-05

6.  Deep vein thrombosis in patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  A Perkash; I Perkash
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-10

7.  Preventing postoperative thromboembolism.

Authors:  F W Blaisdell
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-08

8.  Anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  J M Teitel
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  Thromboembolism prophylaxis in surgical patients.

Authors:  J T Owings
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-02

Review 10.  The pathogenesis and prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients undergoing total hip replacement.

Authors:  D K Potyk; H J Tabbarah
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.