Literature DB >> 6620316

The right to be allowed to die.

A G Campbell.   

Abstract

The unbridled use of modern medical skills and technology in preserving life at all costs has stimulated interest in expressing a 'right to die' by the legally competent patient who is anxious to protect his autonomy. Some recent decisions by American courts are seen to threaten this 'right to die' of competent patients and imply that legally incompetent patients including children should not have this right under any circumstances, even when expressed on their behalf by guardians, nearest relatives or parents. It is argued that this is contrary to 'natural justice' as viewed by most people. It should be possible to develop procedures which are protective of the basic 'right to life' of the incompetent yet will recognise circumstances where they could be allowed to die. This paper was presented at the 1983 annual conference of the London Medical Group, 'Human Rights in Medicine'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Legal Approach; Mueller twins

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6620316      PMCID: PMC1059319          DOI: 10.1136/jme.9.3.136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  15 in total

1.  The rights of minors and the rights of parents revisited, III.

Authors:  Joseph M Healey
Journal:  Conn Med       Date:  1982-04

2.  Medical ethics teaching. Report of a National Medical School Survey.

Authors:  R M Veatch; S Sollitto
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-03-08       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Personal directions for care at the end of life.

Authors:  S Bok
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-08-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  To save or let die. The dilemma of modern medicine.

Authors:  R A McCormick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1974-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Bedside ethics for the hopeless case.

Authors:  F J Ingelfinger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-10-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Moral and ethical dilemmas in the special-care nursery.

Authors:  R S Duff; A G Campbell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1973-10-25       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Quinlan, Saikewicz, and now Brother Fox.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 2.683

8.  The conflict over children's rights.

Authors:  D J Rothman; S M Rothman
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 2.683

9.  Deciding the care of severely malformed or dying infants.

Authors:  A G Campbell
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  On deciding the care of severely handicapped or dying persons: with particular reference to infants.

Authors:  R S Duff; A G Campbell
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  2 in total

1.  Children in a persistent vegetative state.

Authors:  A G Campbell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-10-20

2.  Parental choice and selective non-treatment of deformed newborns: a view from mid-Atlantic.

Authors:  J K Mason; D W Meyers
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.903

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.