Literature DB >> 6616441

The selective nature of metastasis.

J E Talmadge.   

Abstract

The issue of whether metastases result from the random survival of cells released from a primary tumor or from the selective growth of specialized tumor subpopulations endowed with metastatic properties is important to our understanding of the metastatic process and to the development of therapeutic modalities against metastatic disease. We have found that the tumor cells populating spontaneous metastases are more metastatic than the cells populating the parent neoplasm, clearly indicating that metastasis is selective and not random. The selective nature of metastasis is a consistent observation, however, only when tumor cells are obtained from spontaneous metastases from mice bearing heterogenous, poorly metastatic tumors. Tumor cells from spontaneous metastases from mice bearing tumors that have been selected for metastatic potential or that are homogeneous (cloned) do not differ significantly in metastatic potential from tumor cells populating the parent tumor. Thus, under some conditions the process of metastasis can appear random. Although tumor cells from different individual metastases may be homogeneous with regard to a metastatic phenotype, they may be heterogeneous with regard to their sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents. Thus, although metastasis selects for metastatic variants, resulting in the population of metastatic foci with tumor cells endowed with metastatic properties, it does not appear to select for phenotypes irrelevant to the process of metastasis such as sensitivity to therapeutic agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6616441     DOI: 10.1007/bf00046904

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev        ISSN: 0167-7659            Impact factor:   9.264


  119 in total

1.  Metastasis results from preexisting variant cells within a malignant tumor.

Authors:  I J Fidler; M L Kripke
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-08-26       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Studies correlating the growth rate of a tumor and its metastases and providing evidence for tumor-related systemic growth-retarding factors.

Authors:  W D DeWys
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Selection of successive tumour lines for metastasis.

Authors:  I J Fidler
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1973-04-04

4.  Is somatic mutation the major mechanism of malignant transformation?

Authors:  H Rubin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Non-metastasising variants selected from metastasising melanoma cells.

Authors:  T W Tao; M M Burger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-12-01       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Selection and biologic properties of malignant variants of a murine lymphosarcoma.

Authors:  K W Brunson; G L Nicolson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Biological and experimental consequences of the zonal composition of solid tumors.

Authors:  I J Fidler; I R Hart
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Characterization of a murine ovarian reticulum cell sarcoma of histiocytic origin.

Authors:  J E Talmadge; M E Key; I R Hart
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Heterogeneity of malignant cells from a human colonic carcinoma.

Authors:  M G Brattain; W D Fine; F M Khaled; J Thompson; D E Brattain
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Inter-site variation of oestrogen receptors in human breast cancers.

Authors:  W D Tilley; D D Keightley; E L Cant
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  12 in total

1.  N-linked oligosaccharides and metastatic propensity in in vivo selected mouse mammary adenocarcinoma cells.

Authors:  P J Seberger; E M Scholar; L Kelsey; W G Chaney; J E Talmadge
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.150

2.  Comments on 'In vivo selection of human renal carcinoma cells with high metastatic potenital in nude mice'.

Authors:  L Weiss
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  The use of quantitative genetics for estimating the non-inherited and inherited contributions to metastasis formation.

Authors:  J P Volpe
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Tumour volume and macroscopic growth pattern of bronchogenic carcinoma.

Authors:  K Kayser; H Toomes; H H Vollhaber; H U Burkhardt
Journal:  Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol       Date:  1985

Review 5.  Quantitative genetic analysis of tumor progression.

Authors:  V Ling; A F Chambers; J F Harris; R P Hill
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 9.264

6.  Influence of tumor transplantation methods on tumor growth rate and metastatic potential of solitary tumors derived from metastases.

Authors:  J P Volpe; L Milas
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.150

7.  Antimetastatic action and toxicity on healthy tissues of Na[trans-RuCl4(DMSO)Im] in the mouse.

Authors:  R Gagliardi; G Sava; S Pacor; G Mestroni; E Alessio
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 8.  Shaping future strategies for the pharmacological control of tumor cell metastases.

Authors:  R G Greig; D L Trainer
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 9.  Organ specificity of tumor metastasis: role of preferential adhesion, invasion and growth of malignant cells at specific secondary sites.

Authors:  G L Nicolson
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 10.  Rationale and methods for the use of nude mice to study the biology and therapy of human cancer metastasis.

Authors:  I J Fidler
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 9.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.