Literature DB >> 6616136

Gastrointestinal fluoroscopy: patient dose and methods for its reduction.

S J Leibovic, W J Caldicott.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to demonstrate a method which could be used to identify factors which contribute to the radiation exposure to patients from fluoroscopy during contrast examinations of the gastro-intestinal tract. Measurements of exposure made at the level of the X-ray tube collimator were extrapolated to obtain entrance exposure at the centre of the field and used as an index of the integral dose to the patient. Such data have heretofore been unavailable. The population studied included 65 patients ranging in age from 1 month to 21 years. In an initial study, median entrance exposure at the field centre for barium swallow examinations ranged from 0.98 to 1.7 mC/kg (3.8 to 6.6 R); barium meal: 1.9-5.7 mC/kg (7.4-22 R); barium meal with small bowel: 1.4-7.7 mC/kg (5.3-30 R); barium enema: 0.93-7.7 mC/kg (3.6-41 R). Gonadal dose, measured in males, ranged from undetectable to 0.71 mGy (71 mrad). The presence of contrast medium in the fluoroscopic field increased the exposure from a single 100 mm spot film, taken with automatic exposure control, by a factor of up to 16, and fluoroscopic exposure rate, using automatic brightness control, by a factor of 2 or more. We recommend modifications in the operation and design of fluoroscopic equipment, especially when fitted with brightness and exposure controls, for the reduction of patient exposure. Implementation of two modifications, a high/low dose switch, and a variable aperture iris diaphragm, reduced patient exposure from 1.4 to 3.4 times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6616136     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-56-670-715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  2 in total

1.  Is upper gastrointestinal radiography necessary in the initial management of uncomplicated dyspepsia? A randomized controlled trial comparing empiric antacid therapy plus patient reassurance with traditional care.

Authors:  J D Goodson; J W Lehmann; J M Richter; J L Read; S Atamian; G A Colditz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Patient radiation exposure during pediatric cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  S J Leibovic; K E Fellows
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.740

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.