Literature DB >> 6615677

Anaesthesia for caesarean section. A medical audit of junior anaesthetic staff practice.

B M Morgan, J M Aulakh, J P Barker, T Goroszeniuk, A Trojanowski.   

Abstract

This survey compared the safety of 261 healthy mothers of whom 170 received extradural and 91 general anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Anaesthetics were conducted in routine hospital practice by six anaesthetic registrars. Failed intubation occurred in one patient, awareness was reported by 12 patients following general anaesthesia and two patients had abnormal reactions to drugs. In contrast, the numerous complications that arose with extradural anaesthesia were less serious and easier to manage. Hypotension occurred in 11 patients, inadequacy of analgesia in 25 patients and a period of unawareness in 16 patients following sedation after delivery. Extradural block for Caesarean section is thus seen as safer than general anaesthesia when performed by the same group of anaesthetic trainees on healthy mothers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6615677     DOI: 10.1093/bja/55.9.885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  2 in total

1.  Single segment combined subarachnoid and epidural block for caesarean section.

Authors:  N Rawal
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1986-03

2.  Obstetrical epidural anaesthesia in a rural Canadian hospital.

Authors:  R J Webb; G S Kantor
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.063

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.