Literature DB >> 6615058

Efficacy of elective lymph node dissection in patients with intermediate thickness primary melanoma.

D S Reintgen, E B Cox, K S McCarty, R T Vollmer, H F Seigler.   

Abstract

One of the most controversial areas in the management of malignant melanoma concerns the efficacy of prophylactic lymph node dissection. During a retrospective computer-aided data review of over 3000 melanoma patients referred to the Duke University Cancer Center, 613 patients with complete staging along with surgical and pathologic data, having trunk and extremity melanoma, were identified with Breslow thickness in the range of 0.76 to 4.0 mm. One hundred eighty-seven of these clinically node-negative patients received an elective lymph node dissection (WLE/ND). The remaining patients were treated only with an initial wide local excision (WLE) at the time of diagnosis of their melanomas. There was no difference in age at diagnosis or male-female ratio between the treatment groups. A higher percentage of the WLE/ND group (36% vs. 31%) showed ulceration of their primary lesions and a greater mean tumor thickness (1.81 +/- 0.80 mm vs. 1.60 +/- 0.73 mm) than the WLE patients. Despite the force of these two adverse prognostic factors in the WLE/ND group, only ten deaths (5%) have occurred in the elective lymph node group compared to 51 (12%) in the control group. Using a multifactorial analysis to control for the prognostic contribution of the two most informative variables in stage I melanoma, Breslow thickness and ulceration, WLE/ND had an independent favorable effect on survival (p = 0.01). There was no apparent additional benefit to lymph node dissection in patients whose primary lesion measured less than 0.76 mm or greater than 4.0 mm in thickness. The surgeon may use survival estimates with and without elective node dissection based on a prognostic equation ("prognostigram") as a quantitative aid to treatment planning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6615058      PMCID: PMC1353312          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198309000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  10 in total

1.  TREAT OR WATCH?AN EVALUATION OF ELECTIVE TREATMENT OF CLINICALLY UNINVOLVED NODES IN MALIGNANT MELANOMA.

Authors:  T F SANDEMAN
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1965-01-09       Impact factor: 7.738

2.  Inefficacy of immediate node dissection in stage 1 melanoma of the limbs.

Authors:  U Veronesi; J Adamus; D C Bandiera; I O Brennhovd; E Caceres; N Cascinelli; F Claudio; R L Ikonopisov; V V Javorskj; S Kirov; A Kulakowski; J Lacoub; F Lejeune; Z Mechl; A Morabito; I Rodé; S Sergeev; E van Slooten; K Szcygiel; N N Trapeznikov
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1977-09-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Thickness, cross-sectional areas and depth of invasion in the prognosis of cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  A Breslow
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The histogenesis and biologic behavior of primary human malignant melanomas of the skin.

Authors:  W H Clark; L From; E A Bernardino; M C Mihm
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Prophylactic lymph node dissection in clinical stage I cutaneous malignant melanoma: results of surgical treatment in 1319 patients.

Authors:  G W Milton; H M Shaw; W H McCarthy; L Pearson; C M Balch; S J Soong
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Malignant melanoma of the trunk: a retrospective review of 1128 patients.

Authors:  I M Ariel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  A comparison of prognostic factors and surgical results in 1,786 patients with localized (stage I) melanoma treated in Alabama, USA, and New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  C M Balch; S J Soong; G W Milton; H M Shaw; V J McGovern; T M Murad; W H McCarthy; W A Maddox
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Malignant melanoma of the upper extremities.

Authors:  I M Ariel
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  A multifactorial analysis of melanoma. II. Prognostic factors in patients with stage I (localized) melanoma.

Authors:  C M Balch; S J Soong; T M Murad; A L Ingalls; W A Maddox
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  A prospective randomized study of the efficacy of routine elective lymphadenectomy in management of malignant melanoma. Preliminary results.

Authors:  F H Sim; W F Taylor; J C Ivins; D J Pritchard; E H Soule
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 6.860

  10 in total
  13 in total

1.  The impact of dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe guidance on sentinel node biopsy in melanoma.

Authors:  R Pijpers; G J Collet; S Meijer; O S Hoekstra
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-11

Review 2.  Management of the regional lymph nodes in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma.

Authors:  A J Cochran; D R Wen; D L Morton
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Should elective lymph node dissection be used for treatment of primary melanoma?

Authors:  B Biess; E B Bröcker; H Drepper; M Klein; A Lippold; A Peters
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Thin level IV malignant melanoma. A subset in which level is the major prognostic indicator.

Authors:  J W Kelly; R W Sagebiel; S Clyman; M S Blois
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Lymphatic drainage of skin to a sentinel lymph node in a feline model.

Authors:  J H Wong; L A Cagle; D L Morton
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Improved long-term survival after lymphadenectomy of melanoma metastatic to regional nodes. Analysis of prognostic factors in 1134 patients from the John Wayne Cancer Clinic.

Authors:  D L Morton; L Wanek; J A Nizze; R M Elashoff; J H Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Surgical management of regional lymph nodes in patients with melanoma. Experience with 4682 patients.

Authors:  C L Slingluff; K R Stidham; W M Ricci; W E Stanley; H F Seigler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Intraoperative radio-lympho-scintigraphy improves sentinel lymph node identification for patients with melanoma.

Authors:  J J Albertini; C W Cruse; D Rapaport; K Wells; M Ross; R DeConti; C G Berman; K Jared; J Messina; G Lyman; F Glass; N Fenske; D S Reintgen
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  The orderly progression of melanoma nodal metastases.

Authors:  D Reintgen; C W Cruse; K Wells; C Berman; N Fenske; F Glass; K Schroer; R Heller; M Ross; G Lyman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Detection of submicroscopic lymph node metastases with polymerase chain reaction in patients with malignant melanoma.

Authors:  X Wang; R Heller; N VanVoorhis; C W Cruse; F Glass; N Fenske; C Berman; J Leo-Messina; D Rappaport; K Wells
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.