Literature DB >> 6614773

Abdominal drainage following cholecystectomy: high, low, or no suction?

T T McCormack, P D Abel, C D Collins.   

Abstract

A prospective trial to assess the effect of suction in an abdominal drain following cholecystectomy was carried out. Three types of closed drainage system were compared: a simple tube drain, a low negative pressure drain, and a high negative pressure drain: 120 consecutive patients undergoing cholecystectomy were randomly allocated to one of the three drainage groups. There was no significant difference in postoperative pyrexia, wound infection, chest infection, or hospital stay. This study failed to demonstrate any clinically useful difference between high negative pressure, low negative pressure, and static drainage system were compared: a simple tube drain, a low negative used, suction is not necessary and a simple tube drain (greater than 6 mm internal diameter) is the most effective form of drainage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6614773      PMCID: PMC2494372     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  8 in total

1.  Cholecystectomy with and without surgical drainage.

Authors:  I M Goldberg; J P Goldberg; R D Liechty; C Buerk; B Eiseman; L Norton
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Potentiation of wound infection by surgical drains.

Authors:  C Magee; G T Rodeheaver; G T Golden; J Fox; M T Edgerton; R F Edlich
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds.

Authors:  P J Cruse; R Foord
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1973-08

4.  A randomised prospective trial of two drainage methods after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  I Fraser; N W Everson; J R Nash
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Randomized trial of drainage after cholecystectomy. Suction vaersus static drainage through a main wound versus a stab incision.

Authors:  W van der Linden; S Gedda; G Edlund
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Historical and current perspectives on surgical drainage.

Authors:  J P Moss
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1981-04

7.  Drainage after cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C P Chilton; C V Mann
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Intraperitoneal drain in cholelithiasis operations.

Authors:  S Borgström; H Truedson
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand Suppl       Date:  1977
  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  The Value of Abdominal Drainage After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Mild or Moderate Acute Calculous Cholecystitis: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Flavien Prevot; David Fuks; Cyril Cosse; Karine Pautrat; Simon Msika; Muriel Mathonnet; Haitham Khalil; François Mauvais; Jean-Marc Regimbeau
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Routine Sub-hepatic Drainage versus No Drainage after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Open, Randomized, Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Muhammad Shamim
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 3.  Routine abdominal drainage for uncomplicated open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K S Gurusamy; K Samraj
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.