Literature DB >> 6613009

Visual fields for frontal plane motion and for changing size.

D Regan, K I Beverley.   

Abstract

Thresholds were measured in 15 subjects for 2-Hz oscillations of size and for 2-Hz oscillatory motion in the frontal plane using test squares of side lengths 0.5 degrees, 1.0 degrees and 2.0 degrees. Size-oscillation thresholds were lowest (i.e. sensitivity was greatest) for the 2.0 degrees square while thresholds were highest (i.e. sensitivity was least) for the 0.5 degrees square in 28 of 34 tests. Frontal plane motion thresholds, on the other hand, did not generally depend on square size. Equal-threshold contours in the visual field were roughly elliptical in 10 of 13 subjects for both types of oscillation. None of 13 subjects had visual field defects for oscillating-size or frontal plane motion, in contrast with the known incidence of stereo-motion scotomata. One subject was known to be selectively "blind" to stereoscopically-oscillating disparity in some areas of the visual field, but oscillating-size sensitivity was normal in these regions, thus preserving an alternative basis for motion-in-depth judgments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6613009     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(83)90208-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Augmented visual feedback increases finger tremor during postural pointing.

Authors:  J Keogh; S Morrison; R Barrett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Differential effects of retinal target displacement, changing size and changing disparity in the control of anterior/posterior and lateral body sway.

Authors:  W Paulus; A Straube; S Krafczyk; T Brandt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Proprioceptive, visual and vestibular thresholds for the perception of sway during standing in humans.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; D I McCloskey
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Changes in tremor as a function of type of augmented visual information.

Authors:  Michael F Loncharich; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Modeling visual performance differences 'around' the visual field: A computational observer approach.

Authors:  Eline R Kupers; Marisa Carrasco; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 4.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.