Literature DB >> 6611839

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: three years' experience.

J M Ramos, R Gokal, K Siamopolous, M K Ward, R Wilkinson, D N Kerr.   

Abstract

We review the experience of the Renal Unit at Newcastle upon Tyne over the three years 1979-1981, during which 122 patients with chronic renal failure were treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Advantages of the technique included wide acceptability to a cross-section of patients reaching the renal unit, including the elderly and diabetics. Patients who experienced both techniques preferred CAPD to haemodialysis because of the greater freedom and sense of well-being. Patient survival was 94 per cent at two years and rehabilitation was as good as could be expected for the age and primary medical complications of the patients. Control of plasma potassium and phosphate was easier than with haemodialysis. Renal osteodystrophy responded well to a combination of CAPD and alfacalcidol therapy over the two year period for which we have performed serial bone biopsies. Serum aluminium was slightly raised as a result of consumption of phosphate binders and presumed uptake from dialysis fluid but no aluminium related disease has yet been encountered. Anaemia was partly corrected by CAPD with haemoglobin rising to about 10 g/dl on average. CAPD was less costly than home haemodialysis over the first three years and has been adopted as our standard treatment for patients who can expect an early transplant. Disadvantages were persisting problems with peritonitis which still occurred at an incidence of one attack per 39 patient weeks over the last two years, and an actuarial success rate for the technique of only 63 per cent at two years. Twenty patients developed hernias. Weight gain was common and occasionally gross. There was a significant rise in serum cholesterol. The arrival of CAPD has allowed us to increase the intake to our renal failure programme by 50 per cent. However, continued expansion of the technique demands advances in prevention of peritonitis, adequate facilities for admission and particularly an expanding hospital haemodialysis programme to accept the less successful patients from CAPD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6611839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Med        ISSN: 0033-5622


  7 in total

1.  Effect of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis on a British renal unit.

Authors:  A G Morgan; R P Burden
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-10-11

2.  Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis after the honeymoon: review of experience in Newcastle 1979-84.

Authors:  A Heaton; R S Rodger; L Sellars; T H Goodship; K Fletcher; N Nikolakakis; M K Ward; R Wilkinson; D N Kerr
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-10-11

3.  Plasma cholesterol metabolism in end-stage renal disease. Difference between treatment by hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  H Dieplinger; P Y Schoenfeld; C J Fielding
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and renal transplantation: a five year experience.

Authors:  P K Donnelly; T W Lennard; G Proud; R M Taylor; R Henderson; K Fletcher; W Elliott; M K Ward; R Wilkinson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-10-12

5.  "Agrobacterium yellow group" and Pseudomonas paucimobilis causing peritonitis in patients receiving continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  R A Swann; S J Foulkes; B Holmes; J B Young; R G Mitchell; S T Reeders
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Impact of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis on treatment of renal failure in patients aged over 60.

Authors:  A J Nicholls; S Waldek; M M Platts; P J Moorhead; C B Brown
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-01-07

7.  Serum C-reactive protein concentration in the management of infection in patients treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  C R Hind; S P Thomson; C G Winearls; M B Pepys
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.