Literature DB >> 6610501

Quantitative two-dimensional echocardiographic analysis of regional wall motion in patients with perioperative myocardial infarction.

T Force, P Bloomfield, J E O'Boyle, S F Khuri, M Josa, A F Parisi.   

Abstract

Regional left ventricular wall motion was evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiographic techniques with fixed- and floating-axis analytical algorithms in three groups of subjects: normal subjects (n = 15), patients undergoing uncomplicated coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) (n = 10), and patients suffering perioperative myocardial infarction (n = 27). In patients undergoing uncomplicated CABG, fixed-axis analysis in the apical four-chamber view produced septal hypokinesis indistinguishable from the septal hypokinesis seen in patients with anterior myocardial infarction. In addition, fixed-axis analysis enhanced lateral wall motion so that patients with lateral myocardial infarction were classified as normal. Floating-axis analysis corrected these limitations by (1) producing regional left ventricular wall motion in the patients undergoing uncomplicated CABG, which was identical to that in normal subjects, and (2) producing regional left ventricular wall motion in patients with myocardial infarction that was hypokinetic in segments corresponding to the electrocardiographic area of involvement. In patients with new Q waves, fixed-axis analysis detected abnormalities of regional left ventricular wall motion in 24 of 34 (71%) electrocardiographically involved regions but also classified 44 of 100 segments in uncomplicated patients as abnormal. Floating-axis analysis detected regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities in 30 of 34 patients (88%; p less than .05 vs fixed-axis analysis) and only 15 of 100 segments in patients undergoing uncomplicated CABG were classified as abnormal (p less than .001 vs fixed-axis analysis). We conclude that floating-axis analysis is a more accurate and clinically relevant method of evaluating regional left ventricular wall motion in patients undergoing CABG who suffer myocardial infarction as a perioperative complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6610501     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.70.2.233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of methods of fractional area change for detection of regional left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  S Carstensen; U Hoest; L Kjoeller-Hansen; K Saunamäki; D Atar; H Kelbaek
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  2000-08

2.  Analysis of left ventricular regional wall motion in normal neonates.

Authors:  A Miyazaki; F Ichida; I Hashimoto; S Tsubata; T Okada
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-12

Review 3.  Transesophageal echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular function.

Authors:  J M Leung; N B Schiller; D T Mangano
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1989

Review 4.  After the infarct.

Authors:  P Bloomfield
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-12-05

5.  Baseline and follow-up assessment of regional left ventricular volume using 3-Dimensional echocardiography: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Carly Jenkins; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 2.062

6.  Characterization of regional left ventricular contraction by curvature difference analysis.

Authors:  E Marcus; E Barta; R Beyar; A Battler; S Rath; Y Har-Zahav; D Adam; P Lorente; S Sideman
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 17.165

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.