Literature DB >> 660668

Delayed hypersensitivity and neutrophil chemotaxis: effect of trauma.

J L Meakins, A P McLean, R Kelly, O Bubenik, J B Pietsch, L D MacLean.   

Abstract

To investigate alterations in host defense produced by trauma, skin testing with five standard recall antigens was done on admission and weekly on 53 patients with blunt trauma and seven with penetrating missile injuries, who then were classified as normal (N), 2 or more positive responses; relatively anergic (RA), one positive response; or anergic (A), no response. Neutrophil chemotaxis was tested 145 times in 32 patients. Degree of injury was assessed by assigning one point to pelvic fracture, long-bone fracture, head, chest, or abdominal injury, to a maximum of five. The A and RA patients had greater trauma, 3 vs. 1.6 for N, and a significantly increased rate of sepsis (p less than 0.005) and mortality (p less than 0.05). Incidence of anergy depended upon age and extent of trauma. Neutrophil chemotaxis in A and RA patients was significantly (p less than 0.001) worse at 96.7 +/- 2.4 mu and 99.8 +/- 1.7 mu compared to N, 113.2 +/- 1.7 mu, and controls 121 +/- 4 mu. With recovery, chemotaxis returned to normal. It is concluded that failure of delayed hypersensitivity responses follows trauma, is related to the severity of injury and age of patient, and is associated with an abnormality of neutrophil chemotaxis and increased rate of sepsis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 660668     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-197804000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  15 in total

Review 1.  Immunosuppression in the surgical patient.

Authors:  W Browder; D Williams
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  A systematic study of host defense processes in badly injured patients.

Authors:  H C Polk; C D George; S R Wellhausen; K Cost; P R Davidson; M P Regan; A P Borzotta
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Beneficial effect of enhanced macrophage function in the trauma patient.

Authors:  W Browder; D Williams; H Pretus; G Olivero; F Enrichens; P Mao; A Franchello
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Estimation of serum complement and its role in management of trauma.

Authors:  M M Kapur; P Jain; M Gidh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Predicting surgical infection before the operation.

Authors:  J L Meakins; J B Pietsch; N V Christou; L D Maclean
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Neutrophil function in anergic surgical patients: neutrophil adherence and chemotaxis.

Authors:  N V Christou; J L Meakins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  PMN superoxide radical production following a metabolic-endocrine simulation of trauma.

Authors:  B C Moon; M J Girotti; R Dawson; S F Wren
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Primary immune response to keyhole limpet haemocyanin following trauma in relation to low plasma glutamine.

Authors:  P G Boelens; J C M Fonk; A P J Houdijk; R J Scheper; H J T H M Haarman; S Meijer; P A M Van Leeuwen; B M E von Blomberg-van der Flier
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  The walk-in anergic patient. How best to assess the risk of sepsis following elective surgery.

Authors:  N V Christou; H Rode; D Larsen; L Loose; M Broadhead; J L Meakins
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Immunoglobulins and IgG subclasses in children following severe head injury.

Authors:  N W Wilson; Y P Wu; B Peterson; J F Bastian
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.