Literature DB >> 6603757

Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of posterior fossa tumors.

C P Randell, A G Collins, I R Young, R Haywood, D J Thomas, M J McDonnell, J S Orr, G M Bydder, R E Steiner.   

Abstract

The results of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) examinations in 26 patients with histologic (15 cases) or clinical (11 cases) diagnoses of tumors within the posterior fossa were reviewed and compared with x-ray computed tomography (CT). Most tumors displayed an increase in T1 and T2 relative to brain. All seven benign tumors were seen with both CT and NMR, although one of these cases initially was misdiagnosed on the basis of the CT findings. The extent of these tumors was equally well shown with CT and NMR in three cases but was demonstrated better by NMR in four. Calcification was seen with CT but not with NMR in two of these patients. All 19 malignant tumors were demonstrated with NMR. Two of these were not seen with CT. In 12 patients minimal changes consisting of a poorly defined low-attenuation are or minor displacement of the fourth ventricle were noted with CT, although much more extensive changes were seen with NMR. In three patients the changes were equally well shown with both techniques. In the remaining two cases, the extent of the tumor was defined more accurately with contrast-enhanced CT, where the margin between tumor and surrounding edema was better seen than with NMR. Mass effects were better demonstrated with NMR in 13 patients and equally well shown in six. Bony erosion was better demonstrated with CT in two cases. Hydrocephalus with periventricular edema was seen in five patients; in each it was more clearly demonstrated with NMR. The NMR diagnosis of tumors is discussed and relevant new developments are summarized.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6603757     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.141.3.489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  18 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of preoperative MRI scans in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  M A Hammoud; R Sawaya; W Shi; P F Thall; N E Leeds
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Nuclear magnetic resonance of the brain.

Authors:  G M Bydder
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Diffusion-weighted MRI of haemangioblastomas and other cerebellar tumours.

Authors:  F A Quadery; K Okamoto
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2003-03-08       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Solitary brainstem metastasis: comparisons of X-ray computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging to pathology.

Authors:  R K Simpson; D M Sirbasku; D S Baskin
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Imaging for anaesthetists: a review of the methods and anaesthetic implications of diagnostic imaging techniques.

Authors:  G Weston; L Strunin; G M Amundson
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1985-09

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the central nervous system--an update.

Authors:  W Kucharczyk; M Brant-Zawadzki; D Norman; T H Newton
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1985-01

7.  Nuclear magnetic resonance and its applications in medicine.

Authors:  K D Moudgil; D N Rao; B S Narang
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1985 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.967

8.  MRI of subarachnoid dissemination of medulloblastoma.

Authors:  M Kochi; Y Mihara; A Takada; C Yatomi; M Morioka; S Yamashiro; S Yano; J Kuratsu; S Uemura; Y Ushio
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Cost analysis of magnetic resonance imaging at St. Joseph's Health Centre of London.

Authors:  L Reese
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1987-03-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy with occult foramen magnum meningioma--a case for MRI?

Authors:  K Chakravarty; D G Scott; D Dick; J Visick
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.