Literature DB >> 6602595

Combined aortic valve replacement and myocardial revascularization. Experience with a cold cardioplegic technique.

N T Kouchoukos, W A Lell, W J Rogers.   

Abstract

The authors reviewed their experience with combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting using a standardized cold cardioplegic technique for intraoperative myocardial protection in 54 consecutive patients during a 5-year interval ending in May 1982. Calcific aortic stenosis was the most common indication for aortic valve replacement. Thirty-seven patients (69%) had greater than 50-60% stenoses in at least two of the three major coronary arterial systems. No patient with combined aortic valvular and coronary artery disease had only valve replacement during the study interval, and no patient was refused operation. The mean number of arteries grafted was 2.4. There was one hospital death (1.9%), and one patient (1.9%) had electrocardiographic evidence for perioperative myocardial infarction. One additional patient required postoperative intra-aortic balloon pumping. There have been four late deaths in the followup period extending to 65 months. Survival at 3 years for the entire group was 87%, for the patients with aortic stenosis was 95%, and for the patients with aortic regurgitation or mixed lesions was 65%. There were no cardiac-related deaths among the patients with aortic stenosis and one non-fatal myocardial infarction in the follow-up period. The results with this technique of intraoperative myocardial protection are superior to those reported with previously employed methods (coronary perfusion, hypothermic ischemic arrest) and indicate that coronary artery bypass grafting should be performed in all patients with coexisting aortic valvular and coronary artery disease who require valve replacement. A substantial benefit (increased survival, decreased late myocardial infarction) may exist for the subgroup of patients with aortic stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6602595      PMCID: PMC1352902          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198306000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  11 in total

1.  Long-term follow-up after isolated aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  J G Copeland; R B Griepp; E B Stinson; N E Shumway
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Combined aortic valve replacement and myocardial revascularization: results in 220 patients.

Authors:  J V Richardson; N T Kouchoukos; J O Wright; R B Karp
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Cold cardioplegia versus hypothermia for myocardial protection. Randomized clinical study.

Authors:  V R Conti; E G Bertranou; E H Blackstone; J W Kirklin; S B Digerness
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 4.  Management of the postoperative cardiovascular surgical patient.

Authors:  N T Kouchoukos; R B Karp
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Aortic valve replacement without myocardial revascularization in patients with combined aortic valvular and coronary artery disease.

Authors:  R O Bonow; K M Kent; D R Rosing; L C Lipson; J S Borer; C L McIntosh; A G Morrow; S E Epstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Surgical implications and results of combined aortic valve replacement and myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  D C Miller; E B Stinson; P E Oyer; S J Rossiter; B A Reitz; N E Shumway
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  The importance of myocardial protection in combined aortic valve replacement and myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  D C Lundell; H Laks; A S Geha; V B Khachane; G L Hammond
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Aortic valve replacement combined with myocardial revascularization. Late clinical results and survival of surgically-treated aortic valve patients with and without coronary artery disease.

Authors:  F D Loop; D F Phillips; M Roy; P C Taylor; L K Groves; D B Effler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Observations on the optimum time for operative intervention for aortic regurgitation. I. Evaluation of the results of aortic valve replacement in symptomatic patients.

Authors:  W L Henry; R O Bonow; J S Borer; J H Ware; K M Kent; D R Redwood; C L McIntosh; A G Morrow; S E Epstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Evaluation of aortic valve replacement in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.

Authors:  W L Henry; R O Bonow; J S Borer; K M Kent; J H Ware; D R Redwood; S B Itscoitz; C L McIntosh; A G Morrow; S E Epstein
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical results after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement in patients with and without coronary artery disease: value of concomitant myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  L Gonzalez-Lavin; G Kleiber; S Chi; B Lewis; G Daughters
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1986-09

2.  Myocardial revascularization combined with aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  R V Pellegrini; T Kowalsky; A G Marrangoni; R F Dimarco; S Bekoe; K J Grant
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1986-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.