Literature DB >> 6602152

Connections of the bullfrog striatum: afferent organization.

W Wilczynski, R G Northcutt.   

Abstract

Afferents to the dorsal and ventral striatum of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) were revealed by horseradish peroxidase (HRP) histochemistry. Anterograde tracing techniques (autoradiography and anterograde HRP transport) were then used to confirm the projections and to describe their terminal fields within the striatum. The major input arises from the ipsilateral lateral anterior and central thalamic nuclei, which receive tectal (Rubinson, '68) and toral (Neary, '74) input, respectively. These projections terminate in a dense, homogeneous field within the striatal neuropil adjacent to the cell plates of both striatal divisions. A second heavy input arises from the anterior entopeduncular nucleus bilaterally, with axons from the contralateral side crossing in the anterior commissure. This input terminates in both striatal divisions but is heaviest ventrally. Sparser inputs are present from the ipsilateral lateral and medial amygdalar nuclei, the preoptic area (mainly from the very caudal suprachiasmatic division), the posterior tuberculum, and the ipsilateral superficial isthmal reticular nucleus of the tegmentum. All these afferents, with the possible exception of the preoptic input, ascend to the striatum via the lateral forebrain bundle, and all innervate both striatal divisions. The preoptic input terminates within the cell plates, as well as subpially in a pattern similar to that described for tubercular input (Neary and Wilczynski, '77). The tegmental input is very sparse and is most apparent superficially. Afferents from pallial telencephalic areas are not present, suggesting that although anurans receive striatal input from the diencephalon and mesencephalon, they do not possess a homolog of the mammalian corticostriatal system. Further, the extremely heavy input from the middle dorsal thalamic zone suggests that a major function of the anuran striatum involves processing sensory information from the midbrain roof.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6602152     DOI: 10.1002/cne.902140309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  10 in total

1.  How does the toad's visual system discriminate different worm-like stimuli?

Authors:  D L Wang; M A Arbib
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.086

2.  Social cues shift functional connectivity in the hypothalamus.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Morphology of neurons and axon terminals associated with descending and ascending pathways of the lateral forebrain bundle in Rana esculenta.

Authors:  G Lázár; T Kozicz
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  Integration of sensory and motor processing underlying social behaviour in túngara frogs.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Developmental and regional patterns of GAP-43 immunoreactivity in a metamorphosing brain.

Authors:  Andrea Megela Simmons; Leslie H Tanyu; Seth S Horowitz; Judith A Chapman; Rebecca A Brown
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 1.808

6.  Stimulus-specific long-term habituation of visually guided orienting behavior toward prey in toads: a 14C-2DG study.

Authors:  T Finkenstädt; J P Ewert
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Development of tectal connectivity across metamorphosis in the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana).

Authors:  Seth S Horowitz; Andrea Megela Simmons
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 1.808

8.  Non-thalamic origin of zebrafish sensory nuclei implies convergent evolution of visual pathways in amniotes and teleosts.

Authors:  Solal Bloch; Hanako Hagio; Manon Thomas; Aurélie Heuzé; Jean-Michel Hermel; Elodie Lasserre; Ingrid Colin; Kimiko Saka; Pierre Affaticati; Arnim Jenett; Koichi Kawakami; Naoyuki Yamamoto; Kei Yamamoto
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Functional coupling between substantia nigra and basal ganglia homologues in amphibians.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Oculomotor learning revisited: a model of reinforcement learning in the basal ganglia incorporating an efference copy of motor actions.

Authors:  Michale S Fee
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 3.492

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.