Literature DB >> 6601536

A note on estimating selection pressures on insecticide-resistance genes.

R J Wood, L M Cook.   

Abstract

It is useful to be able to measure selection pressures acting on resistance genes in insect vectors of disease, since it is thus possible to predict future changes in frequency and to consider ways to minimize development of resistance. This note describes a method for estimating the selection coefficients, given two or more post-selection phenotype frequencies and knowing the number of generations between them.The method is applied to published data on Anopheles labranchiae under selection with DDT. The relative fitness (1-s) of the susceptibles compared with resistants was estimated by this method to be 31-38%. This was an annual estimate, but if the number of generations per year is known, it is also possible to calculate a value per generation. A computer program for making these estimates is given. The calculations depend on the gene being effectively recessive, i.e., on the heterozygote being killed by the dose applied in the field.Another approach to estimation of selection is by determining the deviation in gene frequency from the Hardy-Weinberg expectations. By this method, the relative fitness (1-s) of the susceptibles in a population of A. funestris under dieldrin selection in the north of the United Republic of Cameroon has been estimated to be 40%. There are difficulties with this method, however, because population mixing may result in deviations that mimic the effect of selection. Examples are discussed for A. gambiae, where population mixing may occur and heterozygote deficiencies for the dieldrin resistance gene have been observed.For both methods of estimation, it is essential to know the real effective dominance of the resistance gene in the wild, i.e., whether the resistance heterozygote is killed or not. This factor is important in the control of resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6601536      PMCID: PMC2536054     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  5 in total

1.  Electrophoretic differences between sympatric ecotypes.

Authors:  J A Scott; G A McClelland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  THE FIVE MATING-TYPES IN THE ANOPHELES GAMBIAE COMPLEX.

Authors:  G DAVIDSON
Journal:  Riv Malariol       Date:  1964-12

3.  The practical implications of studies on insecticide resistance in anopheline mosquitoes.

Authors:  G DAVIDSON
Journal:  Indian J Malariol       Date:  1958-12

4.  Letter: Aedes aegypti complex in Africa.

Authors:  H E Paterson; C A Green; R J Mahon
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-01-22       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Chromosomal differentiation and adaptation to human environments in the Anopheles gambiae complex.

Authors:  M Coluzzi; A Sabatini; V Petrarca; M A Di Deco
Journal:  Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 2.184

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Challenges in estimating insecticide selection pressures from mosquito field data.

Authors:  Susana Barbosa; William C Black; Ian Hastings
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2011-11-01

2.  Blocking the evolution of insecticide-resistant malaria vectors with a microsporidian.

Authors:  Jacob C Koella; Adam Saddler; Thomas P S Karacs
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 5.183

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.