Literature DB >> 6594322

Enoxacin: worldwide in-vitro activity against 22451 clinical isolates.

C Siporin, G Towse.   

Abstract

A worldwide multicentre study involving 31 centres in eight countries was conducted to compare the in-vitro activity of enoxacin with that of other currently available antibiotics. Enoxacin was active against virtually all of the species of Enterobacteriaceae tested (MIC90 less than or equal to 0.25-2 mg/l). It was also effective at inhibiting Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MIC90 = 2 mg/l; n = 3540), Staphylococcus aureus and epidermidis (MIC90 = 2 mg/l; n = 2635 and 837 resp.), Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (MIC90 = 4 mg/l; n = 260), Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Haemophilus influenzae (both MIC90 less than or equal to 0.25 mg/l). The MIC90 for enoxacin against streptococci ranged from 8 to 32 mg/l. Comparison of data from Canada, West Germany, U.K., South Africa and New Zealand showed the MICs for enoxacin to be generally consistent throughout the world. The only exception was for Citrobacter freundii where the MIC90 was significantly higher in the U.K. than in West Germany (P less than 0.05 Mann Whitney U Test). Against susceptible species the activity of enoxacin was generally greater than that of ampicillin, gentamicin and the cephalosporins. Because of the prevalence of resistance to these drugs, there appears to be a continued need for new antibiotics with differing mechanisms of action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6594322     DOI: 10.1093/jac/14.suppl_c.47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  15 in total

Review 1.  Enoxacin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic use.

Authors:  J M Henwood; J P Monk
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Association experiments with aerobic and anaerobic pathogens: a model of in-vitro susceptibility testing in mixed infections. Activity of enoxacin, clindamycin, and metronidazole.

Authors:  W R Heizmann; R Schmid; F Heilmann; H Werner
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Bactericidal activity of enoxacin and lomefloxacin against Escherichia coli KL16.

Authors:  C S Lewin; S G Amyes; J T Smith
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  [In-vitro activity of enoxacin: a multicenter study].

Authors:  B Wiedemann; D Adam; A Bauernfeind; C Blasius; I Braveny; F Daschner; H Grimm; H Hahn; H Langmaack; F Ley
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.553

5.  [Enoxacin concentration in bone tissue].

Authors:  D Adam; K Weismeier; F Sörgel; J Zürcher
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.553

6.  [Enoxacin concentrations in serum and in the wall of the colon during colorectal surgery].

Authors:  M Wenzel; F Sörgel; P Muth; H Kraeft
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Penetration of enoxacin into bronchial secretions.

Authors:  I W Fong; A Vandenbroucke; M Simbul
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Fluorinated quinolones. A review of their mode of action, antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics and clinical efficacy.

Authors:  R Janknegt
Journal:  Pharm Weekbl Sci       Date:  1986-02-21

9.  Bone penetration of enoxacin in patients with and without osteomyelitis.

Authors:  I W Fong; B R Rittenhouse; M Simbul; A C Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Single-dose enoxacin compared with 3-day treatment for urinary tract infection.

Authors:  C I Backhouse; J A Matthews
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.